Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37063170›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2023

Movement Foundations. The perceived impact of a digital rehabilitation tool for returning to fitness following a period of illness, including COVID-19 infection: a qualitative study.

David Salman, Peter Le Feuvre, Oliver Hill, Dean Conway, Simon Taylor, Shruti Turner, Jonathan Korgaonkar, Shehan Hettiaratchy, Alison H McGregor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David SalmanMSk Lab, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1481-8829
Peter Le FeuvreMSk Lab, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Oliver HillMSk Lab, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Dean ConwayMSk Lab, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Simon TaylorSuite 2C, Brosnan House, Rehab Guru, Potters Bar, UK.
Shruti TurnerMSk Lab, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jonathan KorgaonkarEmergency Medicine-Sport and Exercise Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Shehan HettiaratchyDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alison H McGregorMSk Lab, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBPotters Bar Community Hospital · GBUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital interventions can increase physical activity (PA) levels in adults. However, the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the complexities faced when guiding people to start or return to PA following illness or inactivity. A digital tool, Movement Foundations, was developed to provide remote guidance on building strength and capacity across functional movement patterns, with graduated progression based on user responses and input. This qualitative study aimed to explore the perceived impacts of using the tool. Nine participants aged over 35 years from the healthcare and academic healthcare sectors were recruited to use it and were subsequently interviewed. Thematic analysis identified three themes falling under the overarching concept of 'Capability, Opportunity and Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) Plus', encompassing: skills and capacity for movement; opportunities, motivations and barriers for movement; and a personalised, safe space in which to develop. Participants felt that the digital tool increased their capacity and confidence in movement and positively impacted their daily activities. External factors such as illness and stress clouded perceptions of the impacts of PA. Time, work pressures and needing equipment were still considered significant barriers to PA. Still, participants appreciated the flexibility and non-prescriptive nature of the tool and felt that it helped movement to become opportunistic and habitual. Increased capacity for PA and feeling the subsequent physical and mental effects positively influenced motivation. Structure and guidance, with graduated progress, were seen as protective. Guided self-reflection helped participants understand their capacity and limitations with regard to movement and promoted motivation. Although acquiring technical skills to guide movement may be important for those recovering from illness, participants found that a structure promoting individualised guidance, graduated progression and guided self-reflection were important motivational factors for continuing use. Digital interventions should consider these aspects when seeking to promote habitual PA.

Indexed as

BehaviourIllnessPhysical activityRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID37063170
PMCPMC10083518
OpenAlexW4362579293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.