Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37063166›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2023

Clinical trial facilitators: A novel approach to support the execution of clinical research at the study site level.

Jennifer McClure, Aliya Asghar, Anastasia Krajec, Marcus R Johnson, Sandhya Subramanian, Krissa Caroff, Conor McBurney, Sarah Perusich, Amanda Garcia, Danielle J Beck and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Identifying and Deploying Benchmarks for Clinical Research at Sites.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The VA Research Enterprise: A Platform for National Partnerships Toward Evidence Building and Scientific Innovation.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2023
    Article
  10. VA Lessons From Partnering in COVID-19 Clinical Trials.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer McClureVA North Texas Health Care System, USA.
Aliya AsgharVA Long Beach Health Care System, USA.
Anastasia KrajecVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, USA.
Marcus R JohnsonDurham VA Health Care System, USA.
Sandhya SubramanianVA Boston Healthcare System, USA.
Krissa CaroffOffice of Research and Development, USA.
Conor McBurneyHines VA Medical Center, USA.
Sarah PerusichMichael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, USA.
Amanda GarciaVA Cooperative Studies Program Central Office, USA.
Danielle J BeckVA San Diego Health Care System, USA.
Grant D HuangOffice of Research and Development, USA.
United States Department of Veterans Affairs · USDurham VA Health Care System · USEdward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital · USMichael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center · USVA Boston Healthcare System · USVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System · USVA Long Beach Healthcare System · USVA North Texas Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the summer of 2020, multiple efforts were undertaken to establish safe and effective vaccines to combat the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). In the United States (U.S.), Operation Warp Speed (OWS) was the program designated to coordinate such efforts. OWS was a partnership between the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Department of Defense (DOD), and the private sector, that aimed to help accelerate control of the COVID-19 pandemic by advancing development, manufacturing, and distribution of vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) was identified as a potential collaborator in several large-scale OWS Phase III clinical trial efforts designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of various vaccines that were in development. Given the global importance of these trials, it was recognized that there would be a need for a coordinated, centralized effort within VA to ensure that its medical centers (sites) would be ready and able to efficiently initiate, recruit, and enroll into these trials. The manuscript outlines the partnership and start-up activities led by two key divisions of the VA's Office of Research and Development's clinical research enterprise. These efforts focused on site and enterprise-level requirements for multiple trials, with one trial serving as the most prominently featured of these studies within the VA. As a result, several best practices arose that included designating clinical trial facilitators to study sites to support study initiation activities and successful study enrollment at these locations in an efficient and timely fashion.

Indexed as

Clinical trial enrollmentCSPDepartment of Veterans AffairsNODESPRP

Identifiers

PMID37063166
PMCPMC10028341
OpenAlexW4328137359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.