Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37063158›Full record

ArticleJTCVS open2023

Outcomes after concomitant arch replacement at the time of aortic root surgery.

Aravind Krishnan, Alex R Dalal, Albert James Pedroza, Ken Nakamura, Nobu Yokoyama, Emily Tognozzi, Y Joseph Woo, Michael Fischbein, John Ward MacArthur

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Concomitant Aortic Root Replacement in Total Arch Replacement With Frozen Elephant Trunk for Type A Aortic Dissection: A Propensity-Weighted Analysis.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aravind KrishnanDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
Alex R DalalDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
Albert James PedrozaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
Ken NakamuraDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
Nobu YokoyamaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
Emily TognozziDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
Y Joseph WooDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
Michael FischbeinDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
John Ward MacArthurDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Stanford Integrated Cardiovascular/Pulmonary Residency Research Training ProgramR38HL143615 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Michael Peter Fischbein, Marlene Rabinovitch · 2020 to 2026
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R38 HL143615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Contemporary series of aortic arch replacement at the time of aortic root surgery are limited in number of patients and mostly address hemiarch replacement. We describe outcomes after aortic root and concomitant arch replacement, including total arch replacement. Methods: This single-institution retrospective review studied 1196 consecutive patients from May 2004 to September 2020 who underwent first-time aortic root replacement. Patients undergoing surgery for endocarditis were excluded (n = 68, 5.7%). Patients undergoing concomitant root and arch replacement were propensity matched with patients undergoing isolated root surgery based on indication, clinical and operative characteristics, demographics, medical history including connective tissue disorders, and urgency. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression modeling were used to assess the primary outcome of all-cause mortality and the secondary outcomes of prolonged ventilator use, postoperative blood transfusion, and debilitating stroke, adjusted for patient and operative characteristics. Results: Among the 1128 patients who underwent aortic root intervention during the study period, 471 (41.8%) underwent concomitant aortic arch replacement. Most underwent hemiarch replacement (n = 411, 87.4%); 59 patients (12.6%) underwent total arch replacement (with elephant trunk: n = 23, 4.9%; without elephant trunk: n = 36, 7.7%). The mean follow-up time was 4.6 years postprocedure. Operative mortality was 2.2%, and total mortality over the entire study period was 9.2%. Propensity matching generated 348 matches (295 concomitant hemiarch, 53 concomitant total arch). Concomitant hemiarch (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.86, Conclusions: Hemiarch and total arch replacement are safe to perform at the time of aortic root intervention, with no significant differences in survival or stroke rates, but increased ventilator and blood product use.

Indexed as

aortic surgeryblood transfusionoutcomesstroke

Identifiers

PMID37063158
PMCPMC10091289
OpenAlexW4317666056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.