ArticleJTCVS open2023
Proactive risk mitigation for cardiac arrest prevention in high-risk patients with congenital heart disease.
Article in JTCVS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality improvement: prevention of cardiac arrest in children with heart disease on the paediatric intensive care unit.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Efficiency at Heart: Navigating the Hybrid Single-Ventricle Pathway.Annals of thoracic surgery short reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The prevalence of postoperative cardiac arrest (CA) increases with cardiothoracic surgical case complexity and is associated with a 40% to 50% mortality. Despite having a low overall surgical mortality rate at our center, our postoperative CA rates were higher than expected, with an observed-to-expected ratio of 2.6. Utilizing quality improvement methodology, we evaluated the influence of proactive risk mitigation on postprocedure CA in a high-risk cohort of pediatric cardiac patients. Methods: This single-center study utilized the Institute for Healthcare Improvement model. We created and implemented our Proactive Mitigation to Decrease Serious Adverse Events program in July 2020, prospectively enrolling preidentified high-risk patients. Enrolled patients underwent scheduled multidisciplinary reviews via virtual platform at 2 periprocedural time points with discussion of patient-specific risks and the subsequent development of proactive risk mitigation plans. Primary outcome measures were derived from the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium national registry and included rate of postprocedure CA within 7 days and an institution-specific observed-to-expected ratio for postoperative CA. Results: Our baseline median number of high-risk cases between postprocedure CAs was 3. Following project initiation, median high-risk cases between events increased to 7. Our observed-to-expected ratio for postoperative CA decreased from 2.56 during the 12 months before Proactive Mitigation to Decrease Serious Adverse Events program implementation to 1.01 during the 12 months after Proactive Mitigation to Decrease Serious Adverse Events program implementation, and hospital length of stay decreased by ∼10 days. Conclusions: Implementation of periprocedure-related proactive risk mitigation strategies in high-risk pediatric cardiac patients led to improvement in postprocedure CA with a 133% increase in high-risk cases between events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.