ReviewRegenerative therapy2023
Current status of platelet-rich plasma therapy under the act on the safety of regenerative medicine in Japan.
Review in Regenerative therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial contamination risks and clinical safety in platelet-rich plasma therapy and evaluation of rapid microbial detection methods.Regenerative therapy · 2026Article
- Article
- Laws and regulations on platelet-rich plasma use for musculoskeletal pathologies in South America: a narrative review.International orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Basic Points to Consider for Cell Storage under the Act on the Safety of Regenerative Medicine in Japan.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
- Platelet-rich plasma therapy for knee osteoarthritis: Insights from real-world clinical data in Japan.Regenerative therapy · 2025Article
- Safety of Platelet-rich Plasma Treatment for Oral Diseases.Juntendo medical journal · 2025Article
- Recent Achievements in the Development of Biomaterials Improved with Platelet Concentrates for Soft and Hard Tissue Engineering Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Does the Act on the Safety of Regenerative Medicine in Japan ensure "safety"?: Implications of low adverse event reporting.Stem cell reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Japan, a legal framework has been established for the safe and effective application of regenerative medicine. After eight years of the Act on the Safety of Regenerative Medicine (RM Act), discussions have been underway in the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan to revise the law owing to numerous novel technologies and inappropriate case reports not anticipated when the law was enacted. Therefore, in this review article, we have reviewed the regenerative medicine provision plans and the contribution of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy, a regenerative medicine technique widely used in Japan post RM Act implementation, to these plans. As of January 2022, 97.2% of the regenerative medicine provided under the RM Act had been for private practice, and most of them were Class Ⅲ regenerative medicine. Notably, PRP was the most used processed cell under the RM Act. PRP therapy accounted for approximately 66% of the regenerative medicine provision plans in clinical research or private practice and was the most provided regenerative medicine technology in Japan. PRP therapy was primarily used in dentistry to regenerate periodontal tissue (approximately 50%), followed by orthopedics, where it is used to treat osteoarthritis. We suggest that further discussion is essential to determine the factors that should be addressed by the RM act to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PRP therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.