Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37062900›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2023

Continuous and intermittent theta burst stimulation of primary visual cortex do not modulate resting state functional connectivity: A sham-controlled multi-echo fMRI study.

Remy Cohan, Sara A Rafique, Karlene S Stoby, Diana J Gorbet, Jennifer K E Steeves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Remy CohanCentre for Vision Research, Faculty of Health and Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1579-3846
Sara A RafiqueCentre for Vision Research, Faculty of Health and Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3636-4001
Karlene S StobyCentre for Vision Research, Faculty of Health and Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Diana J GorbetYork MRI Facility, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer K E SteevesCentre for Vision Research, Faculty of Health and Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7487-4646

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTheta burst stimulation (TBS) is a type of rTMS protocol which has the advantage of a shorter delivery time over traditional rTMS. When applied to motor cortex, intermittent TBS (iTBS) has been shown to yield excitatory aftereffects, whereas continuous TBS (cTBS) may lead to inhibitory aftereffects, both lasting from minutes to hours. The majority of TBS research has targeted motor, frontal, and parietal regions, and to date very few studies have examined its efficacy at visual areas. We designed a sham-controlled study to investigate the immediate poststimulation and short-term (1 h post-stimulation) effects of iTBS and cTBS to V1.

methodsUsing multiecho functional magnetic resonance imaging, we measured the direct and indirect effects of TBS by comparing resting state functional connectivity (FC) before and after stimulation in whole brain networks, and seeds from V1 (stimulation site) and neighboring occipital and parietal visual networks. In addition, we also measured pre- and post-TBS phosphene thresholds (PTs) to examine the modulatory effects of TBS on cortical excitability.

resultsWe found no changes in FC for iTBS, cTBS or sham stimulation conditions from baseline to poststimulation timepoints. Additionally, cTBS and iTBS had no effect on visual cortical excitability.

conclusionsOur results indicate that unlike our previous low frequency rTMS to V1 study, which resulted in widespread FC changes up to at least 1 h after stimulation, TBS to V1 does not affect FC. Contrary to the studies showing comparable TBS and rTMS aftereffects in motor and frontal regions, our findings suggest that a single session of cTBS or iTBS to V1 at 80% PT using a standard protocol of 600 pulses may not be effective in targeting FC, especially in clinical settings where therapy for pathological networks is the goal.

Indexed as

Motor CortexTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrimary Visual CortexResearch DesignYoung Adultfunctional connectivitymultiecho fMRIresting statetheta burst stimulation (TBS)transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)visual networks

Identifiers

PMID37062900
PMCPMC10175989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.