Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37062774›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Feasibility of simultaneous development of laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Ying-Jui Chao, Wei-Hsun Lu, Ting-Kai Liao, Ping-Jui Su, Chih-Jung Wang, Chao-Han Lai, Jo-Ying Hung, Pei-Fang Su, Yan-Shen Shan

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ying-Jui ChaoDepartment of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, 138, Sheng-Li Road, Tainan, 70428, Taiwan. surgeon.chao@gmail.com.
Wei-Hsun LuDepartment of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, 138, Sheng-Li Road, Tainan, 70428, Taiwan.
Ting-Kai LiaoDepartment of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, 138, Sheng-Li Road, Tainan, 70428, Taiwan.
Ping-Jui SuDepartment of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, 138, Sheng-Li Road, Tainan, 70428, Taiwan.
Chih-Jung WangDepartment of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, 138, Sheng-Li Road, Tainan, 70428, Taiwan.
Chao-Han LaiDepartment of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, 138, Sheng-Li Road, Tainan, 70428, Taiwan.
Jo-Ying HungDepartment of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, 138, Sheng-Li Road, Tainan, 70428, Taiwan.
Pei-Fang SuDepartment of Statistics, College of Management, National Cheng Kung University, No.1 University Road, Tainan, 70101, Taiwan.
Yan-Shen ShanDepartment of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, 138, Sheng-Li Road, Tainan, 70428, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic (LPD) and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) are both challenging procedures. The feasibility and safety of simultaneously developing LPD and RPD remain unreported. We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients undergoing LPD or RPD between 2014 and 2021. A total of 114 patients underwent minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD): 39 LPDs and 75 RPDs. The learning process of LPD and RPD were similar. The cutoff points of the learning curve were LPD, 13th patient (the 27th patient of MIPD), and RPD, 18th patient (the 31st patient of MIPD) according the cumulative sum analysis of operative time. A decrease in the operative time was associated with the case sequence (p < 0.001) but not with the surgical approach (p = 0.36). The overall surgical outcomes were comparable between both the LPD and RPD groups. When evaluating the learning curve impact on MIPD, LPD had higher major complication (≧ Clavien-Dindo grade III), bile leak and wound infection rates in the pre-learning curve phase than those in the after-learning curve phase, while RPD had similar surgical outcomes between two phases. Simultaneous development of LPD and RPD is feasible and safe for experienced surgeons, with similar learning process and comparable surgical outcomes.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPancreatic NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresFeasibility StudiesHumansLearning CurvePancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37062774
PMCPMC10106461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.