Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37062768›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Rapid population growth and high management costs have created a narrow window for control of introduced hippos in Colombia.

Amanda L Subalusky, Suresh A Sethi, Elizabeth P Anderson, Germán Jiménez, David Echeverri-Lopez, Sebastián García-Restrepo, Laura J Nova-León, Juan F Reátiga-Parrish, David M Post, Ana Rojas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The impacts of biological invasions.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amanda L SubaluskyDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. asubalusky@ufl.edu.
Suresh A SethiFisheries, Aquatic Science, and Technology Laboratory, Alaska Pacific University, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
Elizabeth P AndersonDepartment of Earth and Environment and Institute of Environment, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8Th St, Miami, FL, USA.
Germán JiménezDepartamento de Biología, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Carrera 7 No. 43-82, Edificio Jesús Emilio Ramírez, Bogotá, Colombia.
David Echeverri-LopezCorporación Autónoma Regional de Las Cuencas de los Ríos Negro Y Nare (CORNARE), Carrera 59 44-48, El Santuario, Antioquia, Colombia.
Sebastián García-RestrepoDepartamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de los Andes, Carrera 1 No. 18A-10, Bogotá, Colombia.
Laura J Nova-LeónDepartamento de Biología, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Carrera 7 No. 43-82, Edificio Jesús Emilio Ramírez, Bogotá, Colombia.
Juan F Reátiga-ParrishDepartamento de Biología, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Carrera 7 No. 43-82, Edificio Jesús Emilio Ramírez, Bogotá, Colombia.
David M PostDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, 165 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT, USA.
Ana RojasDepartment of Earth and Environment and Institute of Environment, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8Th St, Miami, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of hippos into the wild in Colombia has been marked by their rapid population growth and widespread dispersal on the landscape, high financial costs of management, and conflicting social perspectives on their management and fate. Here we use population projection models to investigate the effectiveness and cost of management options under consideration for controlling introduced hippos. We estimate there are 91 hippos in the middle Magdalena River basin, Colombia, and the hippo population is growing at an estimated rate of 9.6% per year. At this rate, there will be 230 hippos by 2032 and over 1,000 by 2050. Applying the population control methods currently under consideration will cost at least 1-2 million USD to sufficiently decrease hippo population growth to achieve long-term removal, and depending on the management strategy selected, there may still be hippos on the landscape for 50-100 years. Delaying management actions for a single decade will increase minimum costs by a factor of 2.5, and some methods may become infeasible. Our approach illustrates the trade-offs inherent between cost and effort in managing introduced species, as well as the importance of acting quickly, especially when dealing with species with rapid population growth rates and potential for significant ecological and social impacts.

Indexed as

Population GrowthColombia

Identifiers

PMID37062768
PMCPMC10106455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.