Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37062429›Full record

SynthesisThe ocular surface2023

TFOS lifestyle: Impact of societal challenges on the ocular surface.

Fiona Stapleton, Juan Carlos Abad, Stefano Barabino, Anthea Burnett, Geetha Iyer, Kaevalin Lekhanont, Tianjing Li, Yang Liu, Alejandro Navas, Chukwuemeka Junior Obinwanne and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The ocular surface, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Epidemiology of dry eye disease in Argentina.Discover public health · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 10 countries.

Fiona StapletonSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: f.stapleton@unsw.edu.au.
Juan Carlos AbadDepartment of Ophthalmology, Antioquia Ophthalmology Clinic-Clofan, Medellin, Antioquia, Colombia.
Stefano BarabinoASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Ospedale L. Sacco-University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Anthea BurnettSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Geetha IyerC. J. Shah Cornea Services, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kaevalin LekhanontDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Tianjing LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO, USA.
Yang LiuOphthalmology Department, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Alejandro NavasConde de Valenciana, National Autonomous University of Mexico UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico.
Chukwuemeka Junior ObinwanneCornea and Contact Lens Unit, De Lens Ophthalmics Family and Vision Care Centre, Abuja, Nigeria.
Riaz QureshiDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO, USA.
Danial RoshandelCentre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science (incorporating Lions Eye Institute), The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia.
Afsun SahinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Koc University Medical School, İstanbul, Turkey.
Kendrick ShihDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Anna TichenorSchool of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Lyndon JonesCentre for Ocular Research & Education (CORE), School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUNSW Sydney · AUChinese University of Hong Kong · HKIndiana University Bloomington · USKoç University · TRLions Eye Institute · AUMahidol University · THSankara Nethralaya · INUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Waterloo · CAWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Societal factors associated with ocular surface diseases were mapped using a framework to characterize the relationship between the individual, their health and environment. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and mitigating factors on ocular surface diseases were considered in a systematic review. Age and sex effects were generally well-characterized for inflammatory, infectious, autoimmune and trauma-related conditions. Sex and gender, through biological, socio-economic, and cultural factors impact the prevalence and severity of disease, access to, and use of, care. Genetic factors, race, smoking and co-morbidities are generally well characterized, with interdependencies with geographical, employment and socioeconomic factors. Living and working conditions include employment, education, water and sanitation, poverty and socioeconomic class. Employment type and hobbies are associated with eye trauma and burns. Regional, global socio-economic, cultural and environmental conditions, include remoteness, geography, seasonality, availability of and access to services. Violence associated with war, acid attacks and domestic violence are associated with traumatic injuries. The impacts of conflict, pandemic and climate are exacerbated by decreased food security, access to health services and workers. Digital technology can impact diseases through physical and mental health effects and access to health information and services. The COVID-19 pandemic and related mitigating strategies are mostly associated with an increased risk of developing new or worsening existing ocular surface diseases. Societal factors impact the type and severity of ocular surface diseases, although there is considerable interdependence between factors. The overlay of the digital environment, natural disasters, conflict and the pandemic have modified access to services in some regions.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsFemaleHumansLife StyleMalePovertySocioeconomic FactorsAutoimmune diseaseBiologyDry eyeEmploymentInfectionInflammationLifestyleSocioeconomic factorsSystematic reviewTrauma

Identifiers

PMID37062429
PMCPMC10102706
OpenAlexW4365518069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.