Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37062362›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2023

A Computational Model Reveals Learning Dynamics During Interpretation Bias Training With Clinical Applications.

Joel Stoddard, Simone P Haller, Vincent Costa, Melissa A Brotman, Matt Jones

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03592368 (Neurocognitive Targets of Hostile Interpretation Bias Training to Treat Irritability), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03592368 nacompletednot on this map

Neurocognitive Targets of Hostile Interpretation Bias Training to Treat Irritability

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2018 to 2023Enrolled97ConditionsIrritable Mood, Mood DisordersArmsIBT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joel StoddardPediatric Mental Health Institute, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado. Electronic address: joel.stoddard@cuanschutz.edu.
Simone P HallerNeuroscience and Novel Therapeutics Unit, Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Vincent CostaDivision of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, Oregon.
Melissa A BrotmanNeuroscience and Novel Therapeutics Unit, Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Matt JonesDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado.
National Institutes of Health · USOregon National Primate Research Center · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Unit on Neuroscience and Novel TherapeuticsZIAMH002969 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI BROTMAN, MELISSA · 2019 to 2025
$13.8M
Neurocognitive Targets of Hostile Interpretation Bias Training to Treat IrritabilityK23MH113731 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI STODDARD, JOEL JOHNSON · 2017 to 2020
$764k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH113731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome psychopathologies, including anxiety and irritability, are associated with biases when judging ambiguous social stimuli. Interventions targeting these biases, or interpretation bias training (IBT), are amenable to computational modeling to describe their associative learning mechanisms. Here, we translated ALCOVE (attention learning covering map), a model of category learning, to describe learning in youths with affective psychopathology when training on more positive judgments of ambiguous face emotions.

methodsA predominantly clinical sample comprised 71 youths (age range, 8-22 years) representing broad distributions of irritability and anxiety symptoms. Of these, 63 youths were included in the test sample by completing an IBT task with acceptable performance for computational modeling. We used a separate sample of 28 youths to translate ALCOVE for individual estimates of learning rate and generalization. In the test sample, we assessed associations between model learning estimates and irritability, anxiety, their shared variance (negative affectivity), and age.

resultsAge and affective symptoms were associated with category learning during IBT. Lower learning rates were associated with higher negative affectivity common in anxiety and irritability. Lower generalization, or improved discrimination between face emotions, was associated with increasing age.

conclusionsThis work demonstrates a functional consequence of age- and symptom-related learning during interpretation bias. Learning measured by ALCOVE also revealed learning types not accounted for in the prior literature on IBT. This work more broadly demonstrates the utility of measurement models for understanding trial-by-trial processes and identifying individual learning styles.

Indexed as

AnxietyAnxiety DisordersAdolescentAdultBiasChildHumansIrritable MoodLearningYoung AdultAnxietyCategory learningCognitive bias modificationInterpretation bias trainingIrritability

Identifiers

PMID37062362
PMCPMC10576009
OpenAlexW4365505218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.