Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37062144›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2023

Data sharing in the context of community-engaged research partnerships.

Karen M Emmons, Samuel Mendez, Rebekka M Lee, Diana Erani, Lynette Mascioli, Marlene Abreu, Susan Adams, James Daly, Barbara E Bierer, RADx-MA Partners

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Karen M EmmonsDepartment of Social and Behavioral Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. Electronic address: kemmons@hsph.harvard.edu.
Samuel MendezDepartment of Social and Behavioral Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Rebekka M LeeDepartment of Social and Behavioral Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Diana EraniMassachusetts League of Community Health Centers, 40 Court Street, 10th Floor, Boston, MA, 02108, USA.
Lynette MascioliMassachusetts League of Community Health Centers, 40 Court Street, 10th Floor, Boston, MA, 02108, USA.
Marlene AbreuMassachusetts League of Community Health Centers, 40 Court Street, 10th Floor, Boston, MA, 02108, USA.
Susan AdamsMassachusetts League of Community Health Centers, 40 Court Street, 10th Floor, Boston, MA, 02108, USA.
James DalyDepartment of Social and Behavioral Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Barbara E BiererDivision of Global Health Equity, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
RADx-MA Partners

Funding

The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR002541 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2018 to 2022
$93.0M
The Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control Equity - Research ProgramP50CA244433 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI EMMONS, KAREN M., TAVERAS BENAVIDEZ, ELSIE MIREYA · 2019 to 2023
$12.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002541NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, the National Institutes for Health (NIH) has implemented several policies designed to improve sharing of research data, such as the NIH public access policy for publications, NIH genomic data sharing policy, and National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Moonshot public access and data sharing policy. In January 2023, a new NIH data sharing policy has gone into effect, requiring researchers to submit a Data Management and Sharing Plan in proposals for NIH funding (NIH. Supplemental information to the, 2020b; NIH. Final policy for data, 2020a). These policies are based on the idea that sharing data is a key component of the scientific method, as it enables the creation of larger data repositories that can lead to research questions that may not be possible in individual studies (Alter and Gonzalez, 2018; Jwa and Poldrack, 2022), allows enhanced collaboration, and maximizes the federal investment in research. Important questions that we must consider as data sharing is expanded are to whom do benefits of data sharing accrue and to whom do benefits not accrue? In an era of growing efforts to engage diverse communities in research, we must consider the impact of data sharing for all research participants and the communities that they represent. We examine the issue of data sharing through a community-engaged research lens, informed by a long-standing partnership between community-engaged researchers and a key community health organization (Kruse et al., 2022). We contend that without effective community engagement and rich contextual knowledge, biases resulting from data sharing can remain unchecked. We provide several recommendations that would allow better community engagement related to data sharing to ensure both community and researcher understanding of the issues involved and move toward shared benefits. By identifying good models for evaluating the impact of data sharing on communities that contribute data, and then using those models systematically, we will advance the consideration of the community perspective and increase the likelihood of benefits for all.

Indexed as

GenomicsInformation DisseminationHumansPolicyPublic HealthResearch PersonnelCommunity-engaged researchData sharing

Identifiers

PMID37062144
PMCPMC10308954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.