Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37062120›Full record

ArticleThrombosis research2023

Bleeding related to oral anticoagulants: Trends in US emergency department visits, 2016-2020.

Andrew I Geller, Nadine Shehab, Maribeth C Lovegrove, Nina J Weidle, Daniel S Budnitz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thrombosis research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. The first month after direct oral anticoagulants: a window of vulnerability.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Machine Learning for Warfarin Therapy: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. An architecturally rational hemostat for rapid stopping of massive bleeding on anticoagulation therapy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew I GellerDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: ageller@cdc.gov.
Nadine ShehabDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA; Lantana Consulting Group, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Maribeth C LovegroveDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA.
Nina J WeidleDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA; Eagle Global Scientific, LLC, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Daniel S BudnitzDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical trials suggest lower rates of major bleeding with direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) than with warfarin, but anticoagulant-related bleeding remains one of the most common outpatient adverse drug events.

methodsWe estimated the number of emergency department (ED) visits and subsequent hospitalizations for oral anticoagulant-related bleeding in 2016-2020 based on active surveillance in a nationally representative, size-stratified probability sample of 60 U.S. hospitals. We estimated rates of ED visits using a nationally-projected retail prescription dispensing database.

resultsBased on 19,557 cases, oral anticoagulant-related bleeding resulted in an estimated 1,270,259 (95 % Confidence Interval [CI], 644,686-1,895,832) ED visits for the five years 2016-2020, of which 47.8 % (95 % CI, 40.6 %-55.0 %) resulted in hospitalization. Oral anticoagulant-related bleeding resulted in an estimated 230,163 (95% CI, 109,598-350,728) ED visits in 2016 and 301,433 (95% CI, 138,363-464,503) in 2020. During 2016-2020, ED visits for DOAC-related bleeding increased by an average of 27.9 % (95 % CI, 24.0 %-32.0 %; p < .001) per year, while ED visits for warfarin-related bleeding decreased by an average of 8.8 % (95 % CI, -10.7 % to -7.0 %; p = .001) per year. The estimated rate of bleeding visits per 100 patients dispensed oral anticoagulants at least once in 2016-2020 was highest for patients aged ≥ 80 years (13.1; 95 % CI, 6.2-20.0) and lowest for those aged <45 years (4.0; 95 % CI, 2.6-5.5); it was 5.9 visits per 100 patients dispensed DOACs [95 % CI, 2.5-9.2] and 13.0 visits per 100 patients dispensed warfarin [95 % CI, 7.4-18.7].

conclusionsAlthough the rates of ED visits for anticoagulant-related bleeding may be lower for DOACs than for warfarin, persistently large numbers of patients requiring ED visits for anticoagulant-related bleeding despite increased use of DOACs and declining use of warfarin suggest that efforts to improve appropriate prescribing and monitoring of anticoagulants remain important.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationWarfarinAdministration, OralAnticoagulantsEmergency Service, HospitalHemorrhageHospitalizationHumansRetrospective StudiesAnticoagulantsWarfarinAdverse drug eventsAnticoagulant-related bleedingOral anticoagulantsPharmaceutical safetyPublic health surveillance

Identifiers

PMID37062120
PMCPMC10870325
OpenAlexW4361291466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.