Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37062059›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Disease progression status during initial immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) affects the clinical outcome of ICI retreatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Masahiro Torasawa, Tatsuya Yoshida, Yuki Takeyasu, Yukiko Shimoda, Akiko Tateishi, Yuji Matsumoto, Ken Masuda, Yuki Shinno, Yusuke Okuma, Yasushi Goto and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Masahiro TorasawaDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuya YoshidaDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4896-5824
Yuki TakeyasuDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukiko ShimodaDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Akiko TateishiDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuji MatsumotoDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ken MasudaDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuki ShinnoDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke OkumaDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasushi GotoDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hidehito HorinouchiDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9090-801X
Noboru YamamotoDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhisa TakahashiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuichiro OheDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Juntendo University · JPTokyo National Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is still unclear whether patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with disease progression after initial immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, would benefit from ICIs readministration. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively collected data from patients with advanced NSCLC who received ICI retreatment. Depending on the disease status at the discontinuation of the initial ICI therapy, the patients were divided into two groups: with disease progression (PD group) and without disease progression (Without PD group). Patients in the Without PD group were required to experience disease progression during the treatment-free period. Efficacy was assessed by measuring the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival in retreatment (PFS-R), while safety was assessed using the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs).

results30 (46.7%) of 64 eligible patients were included in the PD group and 34 (53.1%) in the Without PD group. Patients in the Without PD group had better clinical outcomes than those in the PD group (ORR, 29.4% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.03, median PFS-R, 4.1 months vs. 2.2 months, hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-1.04; p = 0.07). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that patients in the Without PD group had significantly longer PFS-R than those in the PD group (HR 0.42, 95% CI, 0.21-0.85; p = 0.015). In terms of safety, 28.1% of patients observed irAEs during ICI retreatment, and the incidence rate of grade 3 or higher irAEs was 7.8%. Specifically, of the 28 patients who discontinued their initial ICI treatment because of irAEs, 35.7% developed irAEs, and 28.6% experienced relapsed irAEs during ICI retreatment.

conclusionImmune checkpoint inhibitor retreatment demonstrated efficacy in patients who discontinued initial ICI therapy for reasons other than disease progression. However, ICI retreatment was ineffective in patients with disease progression during the initial ICI treatment.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsRetreatmentRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsimmune checkpoint inhibitorimmune-related adverse eventsnon-small cell lung cancerPD-L1retreatment

Identifiers

PMID37062059
PMCPMC10278515
OpenAlexW4365997807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.