Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37062045›Full record

ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2023

Emergency department utilization, admissions, and revisits in the United States (New York), Canada (Ontario), and New Zealand: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis.

Juliana Duffy, Peter Jones, Candace D McNaughton, Vicki Ling, John Matelski, Renee Y Hsia, Bruce E Landon, Peter Cram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Juliana DuffyDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Peter JonesDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1560-1186
Candace D McNaughtonDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Vicki LingICES (formerly known as the Institute for Comparative and Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
John MatelskiBiostatistics Research Unit, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Renee Y HsiaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9819-6926
Bruce E LandonDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Peter CramICES (formerly known as the Institute for Comparative and Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1910-346X

Funding

Comparing hospitalization rates, outcomes, and treatment intensity for elderly patients across OECD countriesR01AG058878 · NIA · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI Peter M Cram, Bruce E. Landon · 2019 to 2026
$3.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG058878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency department (ED) utilization is a significant concern in many countries, but few population-based studies have compared ED use. Our objective was to compare ED utilization in New York (United States), Ontario (Canada), and New Zealand (NZ).

methodsA retrospective cross-sectional analysis of all ED visits between January 1, 2016, and September 30, 2017, for adults ≥18 years using data from the State Emergency Department and Inpatient Databases (New York), the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System and Discharge Abstract Data (Ontario), and the National Non-Admitted Patient Collection and the National Minimum Data Set (New Zealand). Outcomes included age- and sex-standardized per-capita ED utilization (overall and stratified by neighborhood income), ED disposition, and ED revisit and hospitalization within 30 days of ED discharge.

resultsThere were 10,998,371 ED visits in New York, 8,754,751 in Ontario, and 1,547,801 in New Zealand. Patients were older in Ontario (mean age 51.1 years) compared to New Zealand (50.3) and New York (48.7). Annual sex- and age-standardized per-capita ED utilization was higher in Ontario than New York or New Zealand (443.2 vs. 404.0 or 248.4 visits per 1000 population/year, respectively). In all countries, ED utilization was highest for residents of the lowest income quintile neighborhoods. The proportion of ED visits resulting in hospitalization was higher in New Zealand (34.5%) compared to New York (20.8%) and Ontario (12.8%). Thirty-day ED revisits were higher in Ontario (27.0%) than New Zealand (18.6%) or New York (21.4%).

conclusionsPatterns of ED utilization differed widely across three high-income countries. These differences highlight the varying approaches that our countries take with respect to urgent visits, suggest opportunities for shared learning through international comparisons, and raise important questions about optimal approaches for all countries.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNew YorkNew ZealandOntarioRetrospective StudiesUnited Statesemergency departmentinternational comparisonutilization

Identifiers

PMID37062045
PMCPMC10871149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.