Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37061664›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2023

The impact of software updates on accuracy of intraoral scanners.

Judit Schmalzl, Ivett Róth, Judit Borbély, Péter Hermann, Bálint Vecsei

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07205588 (RESTODATA-NUM), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07205588 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

RESTODATA-NUM: A Multicenter Observational Study on the Assessment of Dental Pathologies Using Digital Tools in Adults

TypeobservationalSponsorRecherche Clinique en Odontologie (ReCOL)Ran2025 to 2027Enrolled350ConditionsDental Caries (Diagnosis), Dental Plaque (Diagnosis), Periodontitis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Achieving Functional and Aesthetic Harmony Through a Fully Digital Workflow for Lateral Agenesis Rehabilitation: A 12-Month Follow-Up.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparison of trueness, time, and number of images among different denture digitization protocols.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effect of scan path on accuracy of complete arch intraoral scan.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Judit SchmalzlDepartment of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkiralyi Street 47, 1088, Budapest, Hungary. schmalzl.judit@phd.semmelweis.hu.
Ivett RóthDepartment of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkiralyi Street 47, 1088, Budapest, Hungary.
Judit BorbélyDepartment of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkiralyi Street 47, 1088, Budapest, Hungary.
Péter HermannDepartment of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkiralyi Street 47, 1088, Budapest, Hungary.
Bálint VecseiDepartment of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkiralyi Street 47, 1088, Budapest, Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital workflow is showing an increasing tendency in everyday dentistry. Accuracy is essential during digital dental workflows for all indication areas. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of software updates on the accuracy of intraoral scanner (IOS) devices.

methods3Shape Trios 3 Pod with software versions 18.1.2. (TRI3_1) and 20.1.2. (TRI3_2); 3Shape Trios 4 Move, version 19.2.2. (TRI4_1); and 3Shape Trios 4 Pod, version 20.1.1. (TRI4_2) were used to take direct optical impressions from a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) full arch reference model with prepared teeth (FDI 11,14,17 for crowns and FDI 26 for onlay) and an edentulous region (between FDI 14 and 17). The scanners were used eight times; STL files were imported into Geomagic Control X for accuracy assessment by comparing them to a reference data set created by an industrial high-precision scanner (AICON SmartScan-3D C5). The average deviation of the surface points was calculated in three locations: across a full arch (Parameter 1), the region of a four-unit bridge (Parameter 2), and a single prepared abutment (Parameter 3).

resultsIn parameter 1 and 2, the newest model with the latest software (TRI4_2) reached the highest accuracy (31.06 ± 5.24 µm and 21.69 ± 7.50 µm). In parameter 3, an older generation scanner running legacy software produced the highest accuracy: TRI4_1, 11.75 ± 0.35 µm.

conclusionAppropriate software updates can significantly increase the trueness and precision of intraoral scanner devices. With updated software, the older generation can match the accuracy level of latest equipment.

Indexed as

Computer-Aided DesignDental Impression TechniqueDental ArchHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalModels, DentalSoftwareAccuracyIntraoral scannerPrecisionSoftware updateTrueness

Identifiers

PMID37061664
PMCPMC10105929
OpenAlexW4365815691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.