Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37061653›Full record

ReviewJournal of human hypertension2023

Vascular function in hypertension: does gender dimension matter?

Rosa-Maria Bruno, Szabolcs Varbiro, Giacomo Pucci, János Nemcsik, Mai Tone Lønnebakken, Karolina Kublickiene, Helena Schluchter, Chloe Park, Ioana Mozos, Andrea Guala and 4 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of human hypertension, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Association between pulse wave velocity and cerebral microbleeds: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Vascular ageing manifestations and hypertension in the community.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 10 countries.

Rosa-Maria BrunoUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm, PARCC, F-75015, Paris, France. rosa-maria.bruno@inserm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6107-3356
Szabolcs VarbiroWorkgroup for Science Management, Doctoral School, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Giacomo PucciInternal Medicine Unit, "Santa Maria" Terni Hospital and Department of Medicine and Surgery-University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0180-859X
János NemcsikDepartment of Family Medicine and Health Service of Zuglo (ZESZ), Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Mai Tone LønnebakkenDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5600-8859
Karolina KublickieneInstitution for Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Department of Renal Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4841-6836
Helena SchluchterDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Chloe ParkMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL, UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK.
Ioana MozosDepartment of Functional Sciences-Pathophysiology, Center for Translational Research and Systems Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania.
Andrea GualaVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.
Bernhard HametnerAIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Center for Health & Bioresources, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2048-1019
Ute Seeland *Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1979-386X
Pierre Boutouyrie *Université Paris Cité, Inserm, PARCC, F-75015, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4375-3569
Sex and Gender VascAgeNet Expert Group
Inserm · FRSemmelweis University · HUAustrian Institute of Technology · ATHaukeland University Hospital · NOHeidelberg University · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESKarolinska Institutet · SEMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing · GBUniversity of Perugia · ITVictor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood pressure and vascular ageing trajectories differ between men and women. These differences develop due to sex-related factors, attributable to sex chromosomes or sex hormones, and due to gender-related factors, mainly related to different sociocultural behaviors. The present review summarizes the relevant facts regarding gender-related differences in vascular function in hypertension. Among sex-related factors, endogenous 17ß-estradiol plays a key role in protecting pre-menopausal women from vascular ageing. However, as vascular ageing (preceding and inducing hypertension) has a steeper increase in women than in men starting already from the third decade, it is likely that gender-related factors play a prominent role, especially in the young. Among gender-related factors, psychological stress (including that one related to gender-based violence and discrimination), depression, some psychological traits, but also low socioeconomic status, are more common in women than men, and their impact on vascular ageing is likely to be greater in women. Men, on the contrary, are more exposed to the vascular adverse consequences of alcohol consumption, as well as of social deprivation, while "toxic masculinity" traits may result in lower adherence to lifestyle and preventive strategies. Unhealthy diet habits are more prevalent in men and smoking is equally prevalent in the two sexes, but have a disproportional negative effect on women's vascular health. In conclusion, given the major and complex role of gender-related factors in driving vascular alterations and blood pressure patterns, gender dimension should be systematically integrated into future research on vascular function and hypertension and to tailor cardiovascular prevention strategies.

Indexed as

HypertensionWomen's HealthAgingFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsSexual BehaviorSmoking

Identifiers

PMID37061653
OpenAlexW4365814374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.