Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37061626›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2023

Psychological Profiles and 12-Month Weight Outcomes of Women Evaluated for Reoperative Bariatric Surgery.

Tim Hoyt, Fawn A Walter, Tegan M Michl

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tim HoytMadigan Army Medical Center, 9040 Fitzsimmons Dr, Tacoma, WA, 98431, USA. timothy.v.hoyt.civ@mail.mil.ORCID 0000-0001-6395-7887
Fawn A WalterMadigan Army Medical Center, 9040 Fitzsimmons Dr, Tacoma, WA, 98431, USA.
Tegan M MichlMadigan Army Medical Center, 9040 Fitzsimmons Dr, Tacoma, WA, 98431, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of psychological screening instruments prior to bariatric surgery has been well established. However, there is currently no specific literature on psychological screening of candidates for reoperative bariatric surgery.

methodsThis study evaluated archival data for 40 women who were candidates for reoperative bariatric surgery and completed the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF). Profile analysis examined differences between patient groups who did and did not undergo reoperative surgery. MMPI-2-RF profiles for reoperative patients then were compared to previous samples of preoperative and postoperative patients. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to predict BMI following reoperative surgery over a 12-month period based on MMPI-2-RF scales while controlling for age and initial BMI.

resultsProfile analysis results showed no significant differences on MMPI-2-RF scale scores between reoperative candidates who did and did not undergo a second surgery. With some minor differences attributed to minimization of symptoms, there were no systematic differences in MMPI-2-RF scale scores for reoperative surgery patients compared to preoperative and postoperative patient groups. BMI outcomes over a 12-month period showed that age and initial BMI were significantly better predictors than MMPI-2-RF scores.

conclusionsAdministration of MMPI-2-RF for reoperative bariatric surgery patients likely is equivalent to its typical use in preoperative screening. Only the MMPI-2-RF Disconstraint scale showed any relationship to BMI outcomes over time following reoperative surgery.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryObesity, MorbidBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansMMPIReoperationReproducibility of ResultsBariatric surgeryBehavioral medicineObesityPersonalityPsychopathology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.