Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37061220›Full record

SynthesisThe ocular surface2023

TFOS Lifestyle: Impact of cosmetics on the ocular surface.

David A Sullivan, Alexandre X da Costa, Ester Del Duca, Tracy Doll, Christina N Grupcheva, Sihem Lazreg, Su-Hsun Liu, Selina R McGee, Rachna Murthy, Purvasha Narang and 6 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The ocular surface, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Implications of Long-Term Double Eyelid Tape Use.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Impact of Exposomes on Ocular Surface Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

David A SullivanTear Film & Ocular Surface Society, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: david@tearfilm.org.
Alexandre X da CostaOphthalmology Department, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ester Del DucaIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA.
Tracy DollSunset Eye Clinic, Beaverton, OR, USA.
Christina N GrupchevaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Medical University -Varna, Bulgaria.
Sihem LazregLazreg Cornea and Ocular Surface Center, Blida, Algeria.
Su-Hsun LiuUniversity of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Selina R McGeeBeSpoke Vision, Edmond, OK, USA.
Rachna MurthyFaceRestoration, London, UK.
Purvasha NarangAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, India.
Alison NgCentre for Ocular Research & Education, School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Steven NisticoDepartment of Dermatology, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Leslie O'DellMedical Optometry America, New Freedom, PA, USA.
Jonathan RoosFaceRestoration, London, UK.
Joanne ShenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Maria MarkoulliSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

Maximizing Use of High-Quality Evidence in Eye Care: Cochrane Eyes and Vision US ProjectUG1EY020522 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Tianjing Li · 2017 to 2026
$10.1M
NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY020522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this report the use of eye cosmetic products and procedures and how this represents a lifestyle challenge that may exacerbate or promote the development of ocular surface and adnexal disease is discussed. Multiple aspects of eye cosmetics are addressed, including their history and market value, psychological and social impacts, possible problems associated with cosmetic ingredients, products, and procedures, and regulations for eye cosmetic use. In addition, a systematic review that critically appraises randomized controlled trial evidence concerning the ocular effects of eyelash growth products is included. The findings of this systematic review highlight the evidence gaps and indicate future directions for research to focus on ocular surface outcomes associated with eyelash growth products.

Indexed as

CosmeticsEye DiseasesEyeHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCosmeticsCosmetic ingredientsCosmetics regulations and guidelinesCosmetic toxic effectsEye cosmetic proceduresEye cosmetic productsEye cosmeticsEyelash growth productsEye makeupOcular surface and adnexa diseaseSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37061220
PMCPMC11246752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.