Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37061014›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2023

Predicting relations between SOAP note sections: The value of incorporating a clinical information model.

Vimig Socrates, Aidan Gilson, Kevin Lopez, Ling Chi, Richard Andrew Taylor, David Chartash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Clinical natural language processing for secondary uses.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vimig SocratesSection for Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, Yale University School of Medicine, 300 George St, 06511, New Haven, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 464 Congress Ave #260, New Haven, 06519, USA; Program of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, 300 George St, New Haven, 06511, USA. Electronic address: vimig.socrates@yale.edu.
Aidan GilsonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 464 Congress Ave #260, New Haven, 06519, USA. Electronic address: aidan.gilson@yale.edu.
Kevin LopezSection for Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, Yale University School of Medicine, 300 George St, 06511, New Haven, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 464 Congress Ave #260, New Haven, 06519, USA. Electronic address: kevin.lopez@yale.edu.
Ling ChiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 464 Congress Ave #260, New Haven, 06519, USA. Electronic address: ling.chi@yale.edu.
Richard Andrew TaylorSection for Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, Yale University School of Medicine, 300 George St, 06511, New Haven, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 464 Congress Ave #260, New Haven, 06519, USA. Electronic address: richard.taylor@yale.edu.
David ChartashSection for Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, Yale University School of Medicine, 300 George St, 06511, New Haven, USA; School of Medicine, University College Dublin - National University of Ireland, Dublin, Health Sciences Centre, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. Electronic address: david.chartash@yale.edu.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
MEDICAL INFORMATICS RESEARCH TRAINING AT YALET15LM007056 · NLM · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Mark Bender Gerstein, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 1987 to 2026
$22.2M
Short Term Research Training: Students in Health Professional SchoolsT35DK104689 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LLOYD G CANTLEY, Sarwat I Chaudhry · 2015 to 2026
$2.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDDK NIH HHS T35 DK104689NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physician progress notes are frequently organized into Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan (SOAP) sections. The Assessment section synthesizes information recorded in the Subjective and Objective sections, and the Plan section documents tests and treatments to narrow the differential diagnosis and manage symptoms. Classifying the relationship between the Assessment and Plan sections has been suggested to provide valuable insight into clinical reasoning. In this work, we use a novel human-in-the-loop pipeline to classify the relationships between the Assessment and Plan sections of SOAP notes as a part of the n2c2 2022 Track 3 Challenge. In particular, we use a clinical information model constructed from both the entailment logic expected from the aforementioned Challenge and the problem-oriented medical record. This information model is used to label named entities as primary and secondary problems/symptoms, events and complications in all four SOAP sections. We iteratively train separate Named Entity Recognition models and use them to annotate entities in all notes/sections. We fine-tune a downstream RoBERTa-large model to classify the Assessment-Plan relationship. We evaluate multiple language model architectures, preprocessing parameters, and methods of knowledge integration, achieving a maximum macro-F1 score of 82.31%. Our initial model achieves top-2 performance during the challenge (macro-F1: 81.52%, competitors' macro-F1 range: 74.54%-82.12%). We improved our model by incorporating post-challenge annotations (S&O sections), outperforming the top model from the Challenge. We also used Shapley additive explanations to investigate the extent of language model clinical logic, under the lens of our clinical information model. We find that the model often uses shallow heuristics and nonspecific attention when making predictions, suggesting language model knowledge integration requires further research.

Indexed as

PhysiciansAttentionElectronic Health RecordsHumansNatural Language ProcessingRecordsElectronic health recordEntailmentIntensive care unitLanguage modelingNatural language processingSOAP notes

Identifiers

PMID37061014
PMCPMC10197152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.