Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37060895›Full record

ArticleHearing research2023

Incorporating models of subcortical processing improves the ability to predict EEG responses to natural speech.

Elsa Lindboom, Aaron Nidiffer, Laurel H Carney, Edmund C Lalor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elsa LindboomDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Aaron NidifferDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA; Department of Neuroscience and Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Laurel H CarneyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA; Department of Neuroscience and Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA. Electronic address: Laurel_Carney@URMC.Rochester.edu.
Edmund C LalorDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA; Department of Neuroscience and Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.

Funding

DEVELOPING AND TESTING MODELS OF THE AUDITORY SYSTEM WITH & WITHOUT HEARING LOSSR01DC010813 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CARNEY, LAUREL H. · 2011 to 2025
$5.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of describing how the human brain responds to complex acoustic stimuli has driven auditory neuroscience research for decades. Often, a systems-based approach has been taken, in which neurophysiological responses are modeled based on features of the presented stimulus. This includes a wealth of work modeling electroencephalogram (EEG) responses to complex acoustic stimuli such as speech. Examples of the acoustic features used in such modeling include the amplitude envelope and spectrogram of speech. These models implicitly assume a direct mapping from stimulus representation to cortical activity. However, in reality, the representation of sound is transformed as it passes through early stages of the auditory pathway, such that inputs to the cortex are fundamentally different from the raw audio signal that was presented. Thus, it could be valuable to account for the transformations taking place in lower-order auditory areas, such as the auditory nerve, cochlear nucleus, and inferior colliculus (IC) when predicting cortical responses to complex sounds. Specifically, because IC responses are more similar to cortical inputs than acoustic features derived directly from the audio signal, we hypothesized that linear mappings (temporal response functions; TRFs) fit to the outputs of an IC model would better predict EEG responses to speech stimuli. To this end, we modeled responses to the acoustic stimuli as they passed through the auditory nerve, cochlear nucleus, and inferior colliculus before fitting a TRF to the output of the modeled IC responses. Results showed that using model-IC responses in traditional systems analyzes resulted in better predictions of EEG activity than using the envelope or spectrogram of a speech stimulus. Further, it was revealed that model-IC derived TRFs predict different aspects of the EEG than acoustic-feature TRFs, and combining both types of TRF models provides a more accurate prediction of the EEG response.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexInferior ColliculiAcoustic StimulationAuditory PathwaysAuditory PerceptionElectroencephalographyHumansSpeechAuditory midbrainComputational modelInferior colliculusTemporal response function

Identifiers

PMID37060895
PMCPMC10559335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.