Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37060541›Full record

ArticleBioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy2023

Characterization for the Similarity Assessment between Proposed Biosimilar SB12 and Eculizumab Reference Product Using a State-of-the-Art Analytical Method.

Hyunsoo Kim, Eunkyoung Hong, Jungmin Lee, Seokku Hong, Jihye Kim, Miju Cho, Yikwon Kim, Taekyung Yoo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hyunsoo Kim *Quality Evaluation Team, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd, Incheon, South Korea.
Eunkyoung Hong *Quality Evaluation Team, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd, Incheon, South Korea.
Jungmin LeeQuality Evaluation Team, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd, Incheon, South Korea.
Seokku HongQuality Evaluation Team, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd, Incheon, South Korea.
Jihye KimQuality Evaluation Team, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd, Incheon, South Korea.
Miju ChoQuality Evaluation Team, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd, Incheon, South Korea.
Yikwon KimQuality Evaluation Team, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd, Incheon, South Korea. itv.kim@samsung.com.
Taekyung YooQuality Evaluation Team, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd, Incheon, South Korea. tkyung.yoo@samsung.com.
Samsung (South Korea) · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSB12 is being developed as a proposed biosimilar to eculizumab reference product (RP), a humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG2/4 kappa immunoglobulin) that binds to the human C5 complement protein. Binding to this protein inhibits complement-mediated intravascular hemolysis by blocking its cleavage into C5a and C5b. Eculizumab RP is indicated for the treatment of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) to reduce hemolysis, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) to inhibit complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy, generalized myasthenia gravis who are anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive, and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in adult patients who are anti-aquaporin-4 antibody-positive.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to demonstrate structural, physicochemical, and biological similarity between eculizumab RP and SB12 using various state-of-the-art analytical methods.

methodsComprehensive analytical characterization was conducted with side-by-side comparison of SB12 with European Union (EU) and United States (US) eculizumab RPs using various analytical methods (more than 40 state-of-the-art assays). Comparisons included purity, product-related impurity, charge heterogeneity, primary structure, post-translational modification, higher-order structure, quantity, Fab-related biological activities (potency and binding activity), and Fc-related biological activities.

resultsBased on the analytical similarity assessment, the structural, physicochemical, and biological characterization results demonstrated that SB12 is highly similar to the EU and US eculizumab RP. In the structural aspects, it was confirmed that there is no difference between post-translational modification profiles and higher-order structures of SB12 compared with the eculizumab RP. Product-related impurities in the form of aggregates and charge variants were also confirmed to be similar. Mechanism of action (MoA)-related biological activities showed that SB12 is highly similar to the EU and US eculizumab RP with respect to overall critical and non-critical quality attributes analyzed. Moreover, similarity of comparative binding tendency of SB12 and eculizumab RP to Fc gamma receptors and C1q was confirmed through additional characterization methods. Based on these results, SB12 is expected to have highly similar safety and efficacy compared with eculizumab RP.

conclusionIn summary, the overall analytical characterization and similarity assessment results show that SB12 is highly similar to the EU and US eculizumab RP in terms of structural, physicochemical, biophysical, and biological attributes.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedComplement C5HumansQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsComplement C5eculizumabQuaternary Ammonium Compoundszwittergent 3-12

Identifiers

PMID37060541
PMCPMC10287819
OpenAlexW4365810884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.