Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37060534›Full record

Trial reportAging clinical and experimental research2023

Can natural environments enhance acute effects of rehabilitation exercise for older adults? A pilot randomized controlled trial.

Tong-Yue Zhou, Xiao-Mei Yuan, Xiao-Jun Ma

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tong-Yue ZhouSchool of Architecture, State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 501640, Guangdong, China.
Xiao-Mei YuanSchool of Architecture, State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 501640, Guangdong, China. xmyuan@scut.edu.cn.
Xiao-Jun MaSchool of Physical Education, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 501640, Guangdong, China. maxj@scut.edu.cn.
South China University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The added value of natural environments in rehabilitation exercise is unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether there are more acute health benefits for older adults after a single rehabilitation exercise session performed in an outdoor natural environment compared with an indoor environment. Twenty-two nursing home residents were randomly assigned to the outdoor (n = 11, 79.5 ± 2.1 years) or indoor group (n = 11, 78.8 ± 5.2 years). Performance test outcomes were measured pre- and post-training session. The indoor group had a significantly higher blood pressure, greater increase in heart rate, higher perceived exercise intensity and physiological fatigue than the outdoor group. The combination of rehabilitation exercise with an outdoor natural environment may reduce exercise fatigue and improve cardiovascular health in older adults, with greater acute health benefits compared with an indoor environment. Rehabilitation exercise in the natural environments may be a highly valued environmental intervention for physiotherapy in older adults.

Indexed as

ExerciseExercise TherapyAgedEnvironmentFatigueHumansPilot ProjectsEnvironmental interventionGreen careGreen exerciseNature-based interventionOutdoor rehabilitationOutdoor rehabilitation ground

Identifiers

PMID37060534
OpenAlexW4365810913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.