ArticleInternational ophthalmology2023
Measuring the agreement of keratometry readings of four devices in eyes with keratoconus.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Repeatability and agreement of two ocular biometers with single and dual Scheimpflug cameras in keratoconus eyes.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024Article
- Advances in IOL calculations in patients with keratoconus.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the keratometry measurement agreement using Sirius corneal topography and Scheimpflug camera, Tomey corneal topography, Topcon autokeratorefractometer, and Tomey OA-2000 optical biometry in eyes with different severity of keratoconus.
methodsIn this retrospective study 115 eyes in different stages of keratoconus were divided into 2 groups of mild (stage 1), and moderate to severe keratoconus (stages 2, 3), according to the Amsler-Krumeich classification. Keratometry measurements were obtained using Sirius corneal topography and Scheimpflug camera (phoenix V3.7.01.08), Tomey corneal topography (Tms SW22C-200S-200), Topcon autokeratorefractometer (KR8900), and Tomey optical biometry (OA-2000 Opt-Meas V.4E).
resultsIn group 1 All devices demonstrated fair agreement in average keratometry values (95% LoA range > 1 D). However, it was poorer for group 2 (95% LOA range > 3 D). In group 1 Bonferroni test revealed statistically significant difference in average K readings among (Topcon autokeratorefractometer 8900 and Tomey OA-2000 biometry, p < 0.01), and between (Tomey topography and Topcon autokeratorefractometer, p < 0.05). Also in group 2 significant difference was observed in the average keratometry of the most instruments (p < 0.01) except for the (Tomey topography and Topcon autokeratorefractometer) and (Tomey topography and Tomey OA-2000 biometry.
conclusionsAccording to our investigation in mild, moderate and severe keratoconus the agreement in K reading between Topcon autokeratorefractometer, OA-2000 optical biometry, Sirius topography and Tomey topography was poor. The agreement declines especially in the steep meridian and it was not acceptable clinically. These devices should not be applied interchangeably.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.