Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37060461›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2023

The ultrasound assessment of osteoarthritis: the current status.

Mika T Nevalainen, Antti-Pekka Uusimaa, Simo Saarakkala

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reply.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Ultrasonography as an Early Evaluation Tool for Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis in Wistar Rats (Rattus norvegicus).Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mika T NevalainenResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, POB 5000, FI-90014, Oulu, Finland. mika.nevalainen@oulu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9483-7690
Antti-Pekka UusimaaResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, POB 5000, FI-90014, Oulu, Finland.
Simo SaarakkalaResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, POB 5000, FI-90014, Oulu, Finland.
University of Oulu · FIOulu University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, osteoarthritis (OA) is diagnosed with the clinical examination supplemented by the conventional radiography (CR). In the research literature, the role of ultrasound (US) imaging in the diagnostics of OA has risen steadily during the last two decades. US imaging is cheap and globally widely available often already in primary healthcare. Here, we reviewed the most essential US literature focusing on OA diagnostics and progression prediction using the various search engines. Starting from the year 2000, our search provided 1 445 journal articles. After reviewing the abstracts, 89 articles were finally included. Most of the reviewed articles focused on the imaging of knee and hand OA, whereas only a minority dealt with the imaging of hip, ankle, midfoot, acromioclavicular, and temporomandibular joints. Overall, during the last 20 years, the use of US imaging for OA assessment has increased in the scientific literature. In knee and hand joints, US imaging has been reported to be a promising tool to evaluate OA changes. Furthermore, the reproducibility of US as well as its association to MRI findings are excellent. Importantly, US seems to even outperform CR in certain aspects, such as detection of osteophytes, joint inflammation, meniscus protrusion, and localized cartilage damage (especially at the medial femoral condyle and sulcus area). Based on the reviewed literature, US can be truly considered as a complementary tool to CR in the clinical setup for OA diagnostics. New technical developments may even enhance the diagnostic value of the US in the future.

Indexed as

OsteoarthritisOsteoarthritis, KneeHumansKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiographyReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonographyHandKneeOsteoarthritisUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID37060461
PMCPMC10509065
OpenAlexW4365810829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.