Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37060275›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2023

Direct electrical stimulation impacts on neuromuscular junction morphology on both stimulated and unstimulated contralateral soleus.

Young Il Lee, Nicola Cacciani, Ya Wen, Xiang Zhang, Yvette Hedström, Wesley Thompson, Lars Larsson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Neuromuscular Junction: A Shared Vulnerability in Aging and Disease.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Young Il LeeDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4993-9038
Nicola CaccianiDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Basic and Clinical Muscle Biology Group, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ya WenDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Basic and Clinical Muscle Biology Group, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Xiang ZhangDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Yvette HedströmDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Basic and Clinical Muscle Biology Group, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Wesley ThompsonDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Lars LarssonDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Basic and Clinical Muscle Biology Group, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3722-035X
Karolinska Institutet · SEThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

SYNAPSE ELIMINATION IN NEONATAL SKELETAL MUSCLER01NS020480 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI MCMAHAN, UEL J · 1985 to 2019
$2.8M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS020480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is increasing evidence of crosstalk between organs. The neuromuscular junction (NMJ) is a peripheral chemical synapse whose function and morphology are sensitive to acetylcholine (ACh) release and muscle depolarization. In an attempt to improve our understanding of NMJ plasticity and muscle crosstalk, the effects of unilateral direct electrical stimulation of a hindlimb muscle on the NMJ were investigated in rats exposed long-term post-synaptic neuromuscular blockade.

methodsSprague Dawley rats were subjected to post-synaptic blockade of neuromuscular transmission by systemic administration of α-cobrotoxin and mechanically ventilated for up to 8 days and compared with untreated sham operated controls and animals exposed to unilateral chronic electrical stimulation 12 h/day for 5 or 8 days.

resultsNMJs produced axonal and glial sprouts (growth of processes that extend beyond the confines of the synapse defined by high-density aggregates of acetylcholine receptors [AChRs]) in response to post-synaptic neuromuscular blockade, but less than reported after peripheral denervation or pre-synaptic blockade. Direct electrical soleus muscle stimulation reduced the terminal Schwann cell (tSC) and axonal sprouting in both stimulated and non-stimulated contralateral soleus. Eight days chronic stimulation reduced (P < 0.001) the number of tSC sprouts on stimulated and non-stimulated soleus from 6.7 ± 0.5 and 6.9 ± 0.5 sprouts per NMJ, respectively, compared with 10.3 ± 0.9 tSC per NMJ (P < 0.001) in non-stimulated soleus from rats immobilized for 8 days. A similar reduction of axonal sprouts (P < 0.001) was observed in stimulated and non-stimulated contralateral soleus in response to chronic electrical stimulation. RNAseq-based gene expression analyses confirmed a restoring effect on both stimulated and unstimulated contralateral muscle. The cross-over effect was paralleled by increased cytokine/chemokine levels in stimulated and contralateral unstimulated muscle as well as in plasma.

conclusionsMotor axon terminals and terminal Schwann cells at NMJs of rats subjected to post-synaptic neuromuscular blockade exhibited sprouting responses. These axonal and glial responses were likely dampened by a muscle-derived myokines released in an activity-dependent manner with both local and systemic effects.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalNeuromuscular JunctionAnimalsElectric StimulationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, CholinergicReceptors, CholinergicChronic electrical stimulationCrossover effectNeuromuscular junctionPost-synaptic neuromuscular blockadeSoleus muscleTerminal sprouting

Identifiers

PMID37060275
PMCPMC10235881
OpenAlexW4365810991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.