Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37060168›Full record

ReviewESC heart failure2023

Optimizing outcomes in heart failure: 2022 and beyond.

Ewa A Jankowska, Tomas Andersson, Claudia Kaiser-Albers, Biykem Bozkurt, Ovidiu Chioncel, Andrew J S Coats, Loreena Hill, Friedrich Koehler, Lars H Lund, Theresa McDonagh and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESC heart failure, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comprehensive Interventions in HBV Care: Nursing-Sensitive Approach.Gynecologic and obstetric investigation · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prognostic value of late gadolinium enhancement cardiac MRI for ICD therapy in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy : A 5-year cohort study.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 17 institutions in 12 countries.

Ewa A JankowskaInstitute of Heart Diseases, Wrocław Medical University and University Hospital, Wrocław, Poland.
Tomas AnderssonAstraZeneca R&D, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Claudia Kaiser-AlbersMSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Biykem BozkurtSection of Cardiology, Winters Center for Heart Failure, Baylor College of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ovidiu ChioncelEmergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases 'Prof. C.C. Iliescu' Bucharest, University of Medicine Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania.
Andrew J S CoatsHeart Research Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Loreena HillSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Friedrich KoehlerDivision of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Department, Campus Charité Mitte, Centre for Cardiovascular Telemedicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Lars H LundUnit of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Theresa McDonaghDepartment of Cardiology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Marco MetraCardiology, ASST Spedali Civili, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Clemens MittmannFederal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, Bonn, Germany.
Wilfried MullensZiekenhuis Oost Limburg, Genk and University Hasselt, Genk, Belgium.
Uwe SiebertDepartment of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT-University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Scott D SolomonCardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Maurizio VolterraniSan Raffaele Open University, Rome, Italy.
John J V McMurrayBritish Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
AstraZeneca (Netherlands) · NLBaylor College of Medicine · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USBritish Heart Foundation · GBCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROFederal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEKarolinska Institutet · SEKing's College Hospital · GBMassachusetts General Hospital · USMSD (Germany) · DEQueen's University Belfast · GBSan Raffaele University of Rome · ITThe Heart Research Institute · AUUniversity of Brescia · ITWroclaw Medical University · PLZiekenhuis Oost-Limburg · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the development of therapies and tools for the improved management of heart failure (HF) continues apace, day-to-day management in clinical practice is often far from ideal. A Cardiovascular Round Table workshop was convened by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) to identify barriers to the optimal implementation of therapies and guidelines and to consider mitigation strategies to improve patient outcomes in the future. Key challenges identified included the complexity of HF itself and its treatment, financial constraints and the perception of HF treatments as costly, failure to meet the needs of patients, suboptimal outpatient management, and the fragmented nature of healthcare systems. It was discussed that ongoing initiatives may help to address some of these barriers, such as changes incorporated into the 2021 ESC HF guideline, ESC Heart Failure Association quality indicators, quality improvement registries (e.g. EuroHeart), new ESC guidelines for patients, and the universal definition of HF. Additional priority action points discussed to promote further improvements included revised definitions of HF 'phenotypes' based on trial data, the development of implementation strategies, improved affordability, greater regulator/payer involvement, increased patient education, further development of patient-reported outcomes, better incorporation of guidelines into primary care systems, and targeted education for primary care practitioners. Finally, it was concluded that overarching changes are needed to improve current HF care models, such as the development of a standardized pathway, with a common adaptable digital backbone, decision-making support, and data integration, to ensure that the model 'learns' as the management of HF continues to evolve.

Indexed as

CardiologyHeart FailureHumansClinical practice guidelinesHealth technology assessmentHeart failureMedical decision makingMultidisciplinary managementPharmacotherapyQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID37060168
PMCPMC10375115
OpenAlexW4365811156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.