Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37060097›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2023

Characterisation of the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) pouch microbiota in a captive population reveals a dysbiotic compositional profile associated with neonatal mortality.

Toby I Maidment, Emily R Bryan, Michael Pyne, Michele Barnes, Sarah Eccleston, Samantha Cunningham, Emma Whitlock, Kelsie Redman, Vere Nicolson, Kenneth W Beagley and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Group BFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Toby I MaidmentCentre for Immunology and Infection Control, Queensland University of Technology, 300 Herston Rd, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia. t.maidment@qut.edu.au.
Emily R BryanCentre for Immunology and Infection Control, Queensland University of Technology, 300 Herston Rd, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia.
Michael PyneCurrumbin Wildlife Hospital, 27 Millers Dr, Currumbin, QLD, 4223, Australia.
Michele BarnesDreamworld Wildlife Foundation, Dreamworld Parkway, Coomera, QLD, 4209, Australia.
Sarah EcclestonCurrumbin Wildlife Hospital, 27 Millers Dr, Currumbin, QLD, 4223, Australia.
Samantha CunninghamDreamworld Wildlife Foundation, Dreamworld Parkway, Coomera, QLD, 4209, Australia.
Emma WhitlockCurrumbin Wildlife Hospital, 27 Millers Dr, Currumbin, QLD, 4223, Australia.
Kelsie RedmanBillabong Zoo Koala and Wildlife Park, 61 Billabong Drive, Port Macquarie, NSW, 2444, Australia.
Vere NicolsonParadise Country, Production Drive, Oxenford, QLD, 4210, Australia.
Kenneth W BeagleyCentre for Immunology and Infection Control, Queensland University of Technology, 300 Herston Rd, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia.
Elise PelzerCentre for Immunology and Infection Control, Queensland University of Technology, 300 Herston Rd, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia.
Queensland University of Technology · AUAustralia Zoo · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaptive koala breeding programmes are essential for long-term species management. However, breeding efficacy is frequently impacted by high neonatal mortality rates in otherwise healthy females. Loss of pouch young typically occurs during early lactation without prior complications during parturition and is often attributed to bacterial infection. While these infections are thought to originate from the maternal pouch, little is known about the microbial composition of koala pouches. As such, we characterised the koala pouch microbiome across the reproductive cycle and identified bacteria associated with mortality in a cohort of 39 captive animals housed at two facilities.

resultsUsing 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, we observed significant changes in pouch bacterial composition and diversity between reproductive time points, with the lowest diversity observed following parturition (Shannon entropy - 2.46). Of the 39 koalas initially sampled, 17 were successfully bred, after which seven animals lost pouch young (overall mortality rate - 41.18%). Compared to successful breeder pouches, which were largely dominated by Muribaculaceae (phylum - Bacteroidetes), unsuccessful breeder pouches exhibited persistent Enterobacteriaceae (phylum - Proteobacteria) dominance from early lactation until mortality occurred. We identified two species, Pluralibacter gergoviae and Klebsiella pneumoniae, which were associated with poor reproductive outcomes. In vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing identified resistance in both isolates to several antibiotics commonly used in koalas, with the former being multidrug resistant.

conclusionsThis study represents the first cultivation-independent characterisation of the koala pouch microbiota, and the first such investigation in marsupials associated with reproductive outcomes. Overall, our findings provide evidence that overgrowth of pathogenic organisms in the pouch during early development is associated with neonatal mortality in captive koalas. Our identification of previously unreported, multidrug resistant P. gergoviae strains linked to mortality also underscores the need for improved screening and monitoring procedures aimed at minimising neonatal mortality in future. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPhascolarctidaeAnimalsBacteriaDysbiosisFemaleRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDysbiosisEndangered speciesEnterobacteriaceaeKlebsiella pneumoniaeKoalaMarsupialMuribaculaceaePhascolarctos cinereusPluralibacter gergoviaePouchReproduction

Identifiers

PMID37060097
PMCPMC10105441
OpenAlexW4365810713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.