Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37060040›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

Arthroscopic versus open cancellous bone grafting for scaphoid delayed/nonunion in adults (SCOPE-OUT): study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

Morten Kjaer, Jeppe Vejlgaard Rasmussen, Robert Gvozdenovic

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05574582 (Arthroscopic Versus Open Cancellous Bone Grafting for Scaphoid Delayed/Non-union in Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05574582 narecruitingnot on this map

Arthroscopic Versus Open Cancellous Bone Grafting for Scaphoid Delayed/Non-union in Adults: Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHerlev and Gentofte HospitalRan2023 to 2028Enrolled88ConditionsScaphoid Fracture, Scaphoid NonunionArmsGraft reconstruction and internal fixation with compression screw
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Morten KjaerGentofte Hospitalsvej 1, Opg. 17 St, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark. Morten.kjaer.02@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3404-316X
Jeppe Vejlgaard RasmussenGentofte Hospitalsvej 1, Opg. 17 St, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
Robert GvozdenovicGentofte Hospitalsvej 1, Opg. 17 St, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
Gentofte Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScaphoid non-union results in pain and decreased hand function. Untreated, almost all cases develop degenerative changes. Despite advances in surgical techniques, the treatment is challenging and often results in a long period with a supportive bandage until the union is established. Open, corticocancellous (CC) or cancellous (C) graft reconstruction and internal fixation are often preferred. Arthroscopic assisted reconstruction with C chips and internal fixation provides minimal trauma to the ligament structures, joint capsule, and extrinsic vascularization with similar union rates. Correction of deformity after operative treatment is debated with some studies favouring CC, and others found no difference. No studies have compared time to union and functional outcomes in arthroscopic vs. open C graft reconstruction. We hypothesize that arthroscopic assisted C chips graft reconstruction of scaphoid delayed/non-union provides faster time to union, by at least a mean 3 weeks difference.

methodsSingle site, prospective, observer-blinded randomized controlled trial. Eighty-eight patients aged 18-68 years with scaphoid delayed/non-union will be randomized, 1:1, to either open iliac crest C graft reconstruction or arthroscopic assisted distal radius C chips graft reconstruction. Patients are stratified for smoking habits, proximal pole involvement and displacement of > / < 2 mm. The primary outcome is time to union, measured with repeated CT scans at 2-week intervals from 6 to 16 weeks postoperatively. Secondary outcomes are Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH), visual analogue scale (VAS), donor site morbidity, union rate, restoration of scaphoid deformity, range of motion, key-pinch, grip strength, EQ5D-5L, patient satisfaction, complications and revision surgery. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will contribute to the treatment algorithm of scaphoid delayed/non-union and assist hand surgeons and patients in making treatment decisions. Eventually, improving time to union will benefit patients in earlier return to normal daily activity and reduce society costs by shortening sick leave.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05574582. Date first registered: September 30, 2022. Items from the WHO trial registry are found within the protocol.

Indexed as

Fractures, UnunitedScaphoid BoneAdultBone TransplantationCancellous BoneFracture Fixation, InternalHumansProspective StudiesRadiusRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesArthroscopicCancellousGraftRandomized controlled trialScaphoidScaphoid nonunionTime to union

Identifiers

PMID37060040
PMCPMC10103438
OpenAlexW4365517085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.