Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37060025›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Fostering formative assessment: teachers' perception, practice and challenges of implementation in four Sudanese medical schools, a mixed-method study.

Elaf Abdulla Almahal, Abrar Abdalfattah Ahmed Osman, Mohamed Elnajid Tahir, Hamdan Zaki Hamdan, Arwa Yahya Gaddal, Omer Tagelsir Abdall Alkhidir, Hosam Eldeen Elsadig Gasmalla

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Elaf Abdulla AlmahalFaculty of Medicine, Al-Neelain University, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8147-3659
Abrar Abdalfattah Ahmed OsmanFaculty of Medicine, Al-Neelain University, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4992-6598
Mohamed Elnajid TahirDepartment of Human Physiology, AlMughtaribeen University, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3057-6612
Hamdan Zaki HamdanBiochemistry Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al‑Neelain University, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9269-8239
Arwa Yahya GaddalFaculty of Medicine, Al-Neelain University, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6790-9989
Omer Tagelsir Abdall AlkhidirAnatomy Department, University of Medical Science and Technology UMST, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8195-3513
Hosam Eldeen Elsadig GasmallaAnatomy Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Neelain University, Khartoum, Sudan. hosamalwakeel@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2590-8587
Al-Neelain University · SDAlMughtaribeen University · SDQassim University · SAUniversity of Medical Sciences and Technology · SD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Formative assessment (assessment for learning) enhances learning (especially deep learning) by using feedback as a central tool. However, implementing it properly faces many challenges. We aimed to describe the perception of medical teachers towards FA, their practice, challenges of implementing FA and present applicable solutions. A mixed-method, explanatory approach study was applied by administering a validated questionnaire to 190 medical teachers in four medical schools in Sudan. The obtained results were further studied using the Delphi method. Quantitative analysis revealed that medical teachers perceived their grasping of the concept of FAs and their ability to differentiate formative from summative assessments as very well (83.7%) and (77.4%), respectively. However, in contradiction to the former results, it was noteworthy that (41%) of them mistakenly perceived FA as an approach conducted for purposes of grading and certification. The qualitative study defined the challenges into two main themes: lack of understanding of formative assessment and lack of resources. Medical teachers' development and resource allocation were the main recommendations. We conclude that there is misunderstanding and malpractice in implementing formative assessment attributed to the lack of understanding of FA as well as the lack of resources. We as well present suggested solutions derived from the perception of the medical teachers in the study and evolved around three approaches: faculty development, managing the curriculum by allocating time and resources for FA, and advocacy among stakeholders.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateSchools, MedicalCurriculumFaculty, MedicalHumansPerceptionAssessmentAssessment for learningChallengesFormative assessmentStudents

Identifiers

PMID37060025
PMCPMC10105490
OpenAlexW4365504405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.