SynthesisBMC gastroenterology2023
Repeatability of radiomics studies in colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Signaling Pathways, Clinical Features, Screening, Diagnosis, and Management.MedComm · 2026Review
- Radiomics-based artificial intelligence (AI) models in colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis, metastasis detection, prognosis, and treatment response prediction.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Editorial: Advances in medical imaging for precision diagnostic and therapeutic applications in digestive diseases.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Binary and Multi-Class Classification of Colorectal Polyps Using CRP-ViT: A Comparative Study Between CNNs and QNNs.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Update report on the quality of gliomas radiomics: An integration of bibliometric and radiomics quality score.World journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Imaging Assessment of Radiation Therapy-Related Normal Tissue Injury in Children: A PENTEC Visionary Statement.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecently, radiomics has been widely used in colorectal cancer, but many variable factors affect the repeatability of radiomics research. This review aims to analyze the repeatability of radiomics studies in colorectal cancer and to evaluate the current status of radiomics in the field of colorectal cancer.
methodsThe included studies in this review by searching from the PubMed and Embase databases. Then each study in our review was evaluated using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS). We analyzed the factors that may affect the repeatability in the radiomics workflow and discussed the repeatability of the included studies.
resultsA total of 188 studies was included in this review, of which only two (2/188, 1.06%) studies controlled the influence of individual factors. In addition, the median score of RQS was 11 (out of 36), range-1 to 27.
conclusionsThe RQS score was moderately low, and most studies did not consider the repeatability of radiomics features, especially in terms of Intra-individual, scanners, and scanning parameters. To improve the generalization of the radiomics model, it is necessary to further control the variable factors of repeatability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.