Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37059924›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of behavioral medicine2024

Behavioural Sciences Contribution to Suppressing Transmission of Covid-19 in the UK: A Systematic Literature Review.

Gill Hubbard, Chantal den Daas, Marie Johnston, Jennifer Dunsmore, Mona Maier, Rob Polson, Diane Dixon

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gill HubbardDepartment of Nursing, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, UK. gill.hubbard@uhi.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2165-5770
Chantal den DaasHealth Psychology Group, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, Scotland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0955-3691
Marie JohnstonHealth Psychology Group, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, Scotland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0124-4827
Jennifer DunsmoreHealth Psychology Group, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, Scotland.
Mona MaierHealth Psychology Group, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, Scotland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8270-261X
Rob PolsonDepartment of Nursing, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3901-2167
Diane DixonDepartment of Nursing, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7099-204X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGovernments have relied on their citizens to adhere to a variety of transmission-reducing behaviours (TRBs) to suppress the Covid-19 pandemic. Understanding the psychological and sociodemographic predictors of adherence to TRBs will be heavily influenced by the particular theories used by researchers. This review aims to identify the theories and theoretical constructs used to understand adherence to TRBs during the pandemic within the UK social and legislative context.

methodsA systematic review identified studies to understand TRBs of adults in the UK during the pandemic. Identified theoretical constructs were coded to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Data are presented as a narrative summary.

resultsThirty-five studies (n = 211,209) investigated 123 TRBs, applied 13 theoretical frameworks and reported 50 sociodemographic characteristics and 129 psychological constructs. Most studies used social cognition theories to understand TRBs and employed cross-sectional designs. Risk of sampling bias was high. Relationships between constructs and TRBs varied, but in general, beliefs about the disease (e.g. severity and risk perception) and about TRBs (e.g. behavioural norms) influenced behavioural intentions and self-reported adherence. More studies than not found that older people and females were more adherent.

conclusionsBehavioural scientists in the UK generated a significant and varied body of work to understand TRBs during the pandemic. However, more use of theories that do not rely on deliberative processes to effect behaviour change and study designs better able to support causal inferences should be used in future to inform public health policy and practice. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42021282699.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntentionPandemicsUnited KingdomBehavioural scienceCovid-19Health psychologyPublic healthTheoretical domains framework

Identifiers

PMID37059924
PMCPMC10104693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.