ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023
The Keratectasia Volume (KEV) in Corneal Topography to Evaluate the Effect of Corneal Collagen Cross-linking in Pediatric Keratoconus.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aimed to evaluate the keratectasia volume (KEV) before and after corneal cross-linking (CXL) in pediatric patients. This study included 40 eyes of 25 pediatric patients (10-19 years) undergoing standard CXL. The support vector machine (SVM) algorithm was applied to transform mass pixels in corneal topography into a three-dimensioned model to calculate the KEV. The KEV, Kmax, K1, K2, Kave, keratectasia area (KEA), and thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) were determined before CXL and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The correlation between KEV and other parameters (Kmax, TCT, max decentration, eccentricity, and so on) was calculated. The KEV was 4.75 ± 0.74 preoperatively and 4.43 ± 1.22 postoperatively at last follow-up (p < 0.002). There was strong positive correlation between the KEV and Kmax (r = 0.806, p < 0.0005). The preoperat ive KEV was 4.32 ± 0.69 in mild to moderate keratoconus (Kmax < 58D) and 5.27 ± 0.37 in advanced keratoconus (Kmax > 58D) (p < 0.0005, t-test). Postoperative KEV and K readings remained stable at the early stage, and the KEV showed a more drastic decreasing trend than Kmax at sixth month. Statistical significance was found in the KEV between preoperative and 6 months after surgery (p < 0.0005), but not in Kmax and other parameters. In 83.3% (15 eyes out of 18 eyes) of the eyes, the preoperative KEV was greater than 4.6 in patients with significant flattening after CXL. Compared with K readings, the KEV can be regarded as a more sensitive index to evaluate the postoperative morphological changes after CXL in pediatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.