Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37059871›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A machine learning approach to predict self-protecting behaviors during the early wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Alemayehu D Taye, Liyousew G Borga, Samuel Greiff, Claus Vögele, Conchita D'Ambrosio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alemayehu D TayeDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences, University of Luxembourg, 4366, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Liyousew G BorgaDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences, University of Luxembourg, 4366, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Samuel GreiffDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences, University of Luxembourg, 4366, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Claus VögeleDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences, University of Luxembourg, 4366, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg. claus.voegele@uni.lu.
Conchita D'AmbrosioDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences, University of Luxembourg, 4366, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using a unique harmonized real-time data set from the COME-HERE longitudinal survey that covers five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Sweden) and applying a non-parametric machine learning model, this paper identifies the main individual and macro-level predictors of self-protecting behaviors against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the first wave of the pandemic. Exploiting the interpretability of a Random Forest algorithm via Shapely values, we find that a higher regional incidence of COVID-19 triggers higher levels of self-protective behavior, as does a stricter government policy response. The level of individual knowledge about the pandemic, confidence in institutions, and population density also ranks high among the factors that predict self-protecting behaviors. We also identify a steep socioeconomic gradient with lower levels of self-protecting behaviors being associated with lower income and poor housing conditions. Among socio-demographic factors, gender, marital status, age, and region of residence are the main determinants of self-protective measures.

Indexed as

COVID-19EuropeHumansMachine LearningPandemicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37059871
PMCPMC10103659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.