Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37059868›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2023

Computed tomography micromotion analysis in the follow-up of patients with surgically treated pelvic fractures: a prospective clinical study.

Natalie Lundin, Henrik Olivecrona, Peyman Bakhshayesh, Lena Gordon Murkes, Anders Enocson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natalie LundinDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. natalie.lundin@regionstockholm.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3309-5926
Henrik OlivecronaDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Peyman BakhshayeshLeeds General Infirmary Major Trauma Centre, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Lena Gordon MurkesDepartment of Pediatric Radiology, Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anders EnocsonDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHigh-energy pelvic fractures are complex injuries often requiring surgical treatment. Different radiological methods exist to evaluate the reduction and healing process postoperatively but with certain limitations. The aim of this study was to evaluate Computed Tomography Micromotion Analysis (CTMA) in a clinical setting for follow-up of surgically treated pelvic fracture patients.

methods10 patients surgically treated for a pelvic fracture were included and prospectively followed with Computed Tomography (CT) at 0, 6, 12 and 52 weeks postoperatively. CTMA was used to measure postoperative translation and rotation of the pelvic fracture during the 52 weeks follow-up. Clinical outcomes were collected through the questionnaires EQ-5D index score and Majeed score.

results10 patients were included with mean age (± SD, min-max) 52 (16, 31-80) years and 70% (n = 7) were males. The median (IQR, min-max) global translation from 0 to 52 weeks was 6.0 (4.6, 1.4-12.6) millimeters and median global rotation was 2.6 (2.4, 0.7-4.7) degrees. The general trend was a larger translation between 0 and 6 weeks postoperatively compared to 6-12 and 12-52 weeks. For the clinical outcomes, the general trend was that all patients started from high scores which decreased in the first postoperative follow-up and recovered to different extent during the study period.

conclusionCTMA was successfully used in the follow-up of surgically treated pelvic fracture patients. Movement in the pelvic fractures after surgical fixation was largest between 0 and 6 weeks.

Indexed as

Fractures, BonePelvic BonesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFracture Fixation, InternalHumansMaleProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeLow-dose CTPelvic fractureSurgical treatmentTrauma

Identifiers

PMID37059868
PMCPMC10504208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.