Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37059731›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

The stability of transient relationships.

Valentín Vergara Hidd, Eduardo López, Simone Centellegher, Sam G B Roberts, Bruno Lepri, Robin I M Dunbar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Homophily in friendship choice during an early life transition: A cohort network dynamic approach.Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valentín Vergara Hidd *Computational and Data Sciences Department, George Mason University, Fairfax, 22030, USA. vvergara@gmu.edu.
Eduardo López *Computational and Data Sciences Department, George Mason University, Fairfax, 22030, USA.
Simone CentellegherFondazione Bruno Kessler, Mobile and Social Computing Lab, Trento, 38123, Italy.
Sam G B RobertsSchool of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK.
Bruno LepriFondazione Bruno Kessler, Mobile and Social Computing Lab, Trento, 38123, Italy.
Robin I M DunbarDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 66G, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contrast to long-term relationships, far less is known about the temporal evolution of transient relationships, although these constitute a substantial fraction of people's communication networks. Previous literature suggests that ratings of relationship emotional intensity decay gradually until the relationship ends. Using mobile phone data from three countries (US, UK, and Italy), we demonstrate that the volume of communication between ego and its transient alters does not display such a systematic decay, instead showing a lack of any dominant trends. This means that the communication volume of egos to groups of similar transient alters is stable. We show that alters with longer lifetimes in ego's network receive more calls, with the lifetime of the relationship being predictable from call volume within the first few weeks of first contact. This is observed across all three countries, which include samples of egos at different life stages. The relation between early call volume and lifetime is consistent with the suggestion that individuals initially engage with a new alter so as to evaluate their potential as a tie in terms of homophily.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneSocial SupportEgoEmotionsHumansItaly

Identifiers

PMID37059731
PMCPMC10104882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.