Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37059395›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of nutrition2023

Total Iron Absorbed from Iron-Biofortified Potatoes Is Higher than that from Nonbiofortified Potatoes: A Randomized Trial Using Stable Iron Isotopes in Women from the Peruvian Highlands.

Gabriela Burgos, Reyna Liria, Christophe Zeder, Paul A Kroon, Guy Hareau, Mary Penny, Jack Dainty, Olla Al-Jaibaji, Erick Boy, Richard Mithen and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05154500 (Evaluating Iron and Zinc Bioavailability From Biofortified Potatoes to Reduce Malnutrition in the Andean Highlands), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05154500 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluating Iron and Zinc Bioavailability From Biofortified Potatoes to Reduce Malnutrition in the Andean Highlands

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto de Investigacion Nutricional, PeruRan2018 to 2022Enrolled179ConditionsBiofortification, PotatoArmsIron biofortified potato, Zinc biofortified potato
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Biofortification of potato nutrition.Journal of advanced research · 2025
    Review
  4. Potato and sweetpotato breeding at the international potato center: approaches, outcomes and the way forward.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Gabriela BurgosGenetics, Genomics, and Crop Improvement Program, International Potato Center, Lima, Peru.
Reyna LiriaInstituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima, Peru.
Christophe ZederETH Zürich, Laboratory of Human Nutrition, Institute of Food, Nutrition, and Health, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Zurich, Switzerland.
Paul A KroonQuadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Guy HareauGenetics, Genomics, and Crop Improvement Program, International Potato Center, Lima, Peru.
Mary PennyInstituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima, Peru.
Jack DaintyNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Olla Al-JaibajiQuadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Erick BoyHarvestPlus /International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, United States.
Richard MithenLiggins Institute, Waipapa Taumata Rau - The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Richard F HurrellETH Zürich, Laboratory of Human Nutrition, Institute of Food, Nutrition, and Health, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Zurich, Switzerland.
Elisa SalasGenetics, Genomics, and Crop Improvement Program, International Potato Center, Lima, Peru.
Thomas Zum FeldeGenetics, Genomics, and Crop Improvement Program, International Potato Center, Lima, Peru.
Michael B ZimmermannETH Zürich, Laboratory of Human Nutrition, Institute of Food, Nutrition, and Health, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Zurich, Switzerland.
Susan Fairweather-TaitNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom. Electronic address: s.fairweather-tait@uea.ac.uk.
International Potato Center · PEETH Zurich · CHInstituto de Investigación Nutricional · PEUniversity of East Anglia · GBInternational Food Policy Research Institute · USNorwich Research Park · GBQuadram Institute · GBUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S014039/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYellow-fleshed potatoes biofortified with iron have been developed through conventional breeding, but the bioavailability of iron is unknown.

objectivesOur objective was to measure iron absorption from an iron-biofortified yellow-fleshed potato clone in comparison with a nonbiofortified yellow-fleshed potato variety.

methodsWe conducted a single-blinded, randomized, crossover, multiple-meal intervention study. Women (n = 28; mean ± SD plasma ferritin 21.3 ± 3.3 μg/L) consumed 10 meals (460 g) of both potatoes, each meal extrinsically labeled with either

resultsMean ± SD iron, phytic acid, and ascorbic acid concentrations in iron-biofortified and the nonfortified potato meals (mg/per 100 mg) were 0.63 ± 0.01 and 0.31 ± 0.01, 39.34 ± 3.04 and 3.10 ± 1.72, and 7.65 ± 0.34 and 3.74 ± 0.39, respectively (P < 0.01), whereas chlorogenic acid concentrations were 15.14 ± 1.72 and 22.52 ± 3.98, respectively (P < 0.05). Geometric mean (95% CI) fractional iron absorption from the iron-biofortified clone and the nonbiofortified variety were 12.1% (10.3%-14.2%) and 16.6% (14.0%-19.6%), respectively (P < 0.001). Total iron absorption from the iron-biofortified clone and the nonbiofortified variety were 0.35 mg (0.30-0.41 mg) and 0.24 mg (0.20-0.28 mg) per 460 g meal, respectively (P < 0.001).

conclusionsTIA from iron-biofortified potato meals was 45.8% higher than that from nonbiofortified potato meals, suggesting that iron biofortification of potatoes through conventional breeding is a promising approach to improve iron intake in iron-deficient women. The study was registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov as Identifier number NCT05154500.

Indexed as

IronSolanum tuberosumBiological AvailabilityFemaleFood, FortifiedHumansIron IsotopesPeruSulfatesIronIron IsotopesSulfatesbioavailabilitybiofortified cropiron absorptioniron-biofortified potatoLatin Americastable isotopeswomen

Identifiers

PMID37059395
PMCPMC10308245
OpenAlexW4365810835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.