Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37059081›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2023

Effects of Gradual and Sudden Introduction of Perturbations on Adaptive Responses to Formant-Shift and Formant-Clamp Perturbations.

Sara-Ching Chao, Ayoub Daliri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Working Memory Modulates Auditory Perceptual Sensitivity During Speech Planning.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026
    Article
  2. Practice Parameters That Influence Vocal Motor Adaptation in Altered Auditory Feedback Paradigms.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sara-Ching ChaoCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe.
Ayoub DaliriCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe.ORCID 0000-0003-3793-2947

Funding

Auditory prediction and error evaluation in the speech of individuals who stutterR01DC020162 · NIDCD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI Ayoub Daliri · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
Improving speech motor learning processes using augmented behavioral interventionsR01DC019905 · NIDCD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI Ayoub Daliri · 2022 to 2026
$1.8M
Neural processes of speech planningR21DC017563 · NIDCD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI DALIRI, AYOUB · 2019 to 2021
$491k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019905NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020162NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC017563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhen the speech motor system encounters errors, it generates adaptive responses to compensate for the errors. Unlike errors induced by formant-shift perturbations, errors induced by formant-clamp perturbations do not correspond with the speaker's speech (i.e., degraded motor-to-auditory correspondence). We previously showed that adaptive responses to formant-clamp perturbations are smaller than responses to formant-shift perturbations when perturbations are introduced gradually. This study examined responses to formant-clamp and formant-shift perturbations when perturbations are introduced suddenly.

methodOne group of participants (

resultsWe found that (a) the difference between responses to formant-clamp and formant-shift perturbations was smaller when the perturbations were introduced suddenly and (b) responses to suddenly introduced (but not gradually introduced) formant-shift perturbations positively correlated with responses to formant-clamp perturbations.

conclusionsThese results showed that the speech motor system responds to errors induced by formant-shift and formant-clamp perturbations more differently when perturbations are introduced gradually than suddenly. Overall, the quality of errors (formant-shift vs. formant-clamp) and the manner of introducing errors (gradually vs. suddenly) modulate the speech motor system's evaluations of and responses to errors. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.22406422.

Indexed as

SpeechSpeech PerceptionHumansPhoneticsSpeech Acoustics

Identifiers

PMID37059081
PMCPMC10457088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.