Observational studyInternational journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology2023
The impact of obstructive sleep apnea screening guidelines in a population-based, midwestern cohort of children with Down Syndrome.
Observational study in International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objective/Background: The high rate of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in Down Syndrome (DS) is well described in the literature. The impact of the 2011 screening guidelines has not been fully evaluated. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the 2011 screening guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in a community cohort of children with Down Syndrome. PATIENTS/
methodsThis is a retrospective, observational study conducted on 85 individuals with DS born between 1995 and 2011 in a nine-county region of southeast Minnesota. The Rochester Epidemiological Project (REP) Database was used to identify these individuals.
results/Conclusions: Sixty-four percent of the patients with DS had OSA. Post guideline publication, the median age at OSA diagnosis was higher (5.9 years; p = 0.003) and polysomnography (PSG) was used more often to establish the diagnosis. Most children underwent first line therapy with adenotonsillectomy. There was a high degree of residual OSA after surgery (65%). There were trends post guideline publication towards increased PSG use and for consideration of additional therapy beyond adenotonsillectomy. The use of PSG before and after first line treatment for OSA in children with DS is needed due to the high rate of residual OSA. Unexpectedly, in our study, the age at OSA diagnosis was higher after guideline publication. Continued assessment of clinical impact and refinement of these guidelines will be of benefit to individuals with DS given the prevalence and longitudinal nature of OSA in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.