ArticlePloS one2023
Association of epicardial fat with cardiac structure and function and cardiovascular outcomes: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serum Lipids, Inflammation, and the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation: Pathophysiological Links and Clinical Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpicardial fat represents visceral adiposity. Many observational studies have reported that increased epicardial is associated with adverse metabolic profile, cardiovascular risk factors, and coronary atherosclerosis in patients with cardiovascular diseases and in general population. We and others have previously reported the association of increased epicardial fat with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction as well as the development of heart failure (HF) and coronary artery disease in these populations. In some studies, however, the association did not reach statistical significance. The inconsistent results may be due to limited power, different imaging modalities for quantifying epicardial fat volume, and different outcome definitions. Accordingly, we aim to perform the systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the association of epicardial fat with cardiac structure and function and cardiovascular outcomes.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis will include observational studies examining the association of epicardial fat with cardiac structure and function or the cardiovascular outcomes. Relevant studies will be identified by searching electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus and by manual screening of reference lists of relevant reviews and retrieved studies. The primary outcome will be cardiac structure and function. The secondary outcome will be cardiovascular events including death from cardiovascular causes, hospitalization for HF, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and unstable angina. DISCUSSION: The results of our systematic review and meta-analysis will provide evidence regarding the clinical usefulness of epicardial fat assessment. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: INPLASY 202280109.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.