Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37058541›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2023

Recurrent predictive coding models for associative memory employing covariance learning.

Mufeng Tang, Tommaso Salvatori, Beren Millidge, Yuhang Song, Thomas Lukasiewicz, Rafal Bogacz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Hippocampal mismatch signals are based on episodic memories and not schematic knowledge.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Learning predictive signals within a local recurrent circuit.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Predictive coding networks for temporal prediction.PLoS computational biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Sequential Memory with Temporal Predictive Coding.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2023
    Article
  10. Learning on Arbitrary Graph Topologies via Predictive Coding.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mufeng TangMRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Tommaso SalvatoriDepartment of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Beren MillidgeMRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Yuhang SongMRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7999-0291
Thomas LukasiewiczDepartment of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rafal BogaczMRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8994-1661

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00003/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The computational principles adopted by the hippocampus in associative memory (AM) tasks have been one of the most studied topics in computational and theoretical neuroscience. Recent theories suggested that AM and the predictive activities of the hippocampus could be described within a unitary account, and that predictive coding underlies the computations supporting AM in the hippocampus. Following this theory, a computational model based on classical hierarchical predictive networks was proposed and was shown to perform well in various AM tasks. However, this fully hierarchical model did not incorporate recurrent connections, an architectural component of the CA3 region of the hippocampus that is crucial for AM. This makes the structure of the model inconsistent with the known connectivity of CA3 and classical recurrent models such as Hopfield Networks, which learn the covariance of inputs through their recurrent connections to perform AM. Earlier PC models that learn the covariance information of inputs explicitly via recurrent connections seem to be a solution to these issues. Here, we show that although these models can perform AM, they do it in an implausible and numerically unstable way. Instead, we propose alternatives to these earlier covariance-learning predictive coding networks, which learn the covariance information implicitly and plausibly, and can use dendritic structures to encode prediction errors. We show analytically that our proposed models are perfectly equivalent to the earlier predictive coding model learning covariance explicitly, and encounter no numerical issues when performing AM tasks in practice. We further show that our models can be combined with hierarchical predictive coding networks to model the hippocampo-neocortical interactions. Our models provide a biologically plausible approach to modelling the hippocampal network, pointing to a potential computational mechanism during hippocampal memory formation and recall, which employs both predictive coding and covariance learning based on the recurrent network structure of the hippocampus.

Indexed as

HippocampusLearningConditioning, ClassicalMental RecallModels, Neurological

Identifiers

PMID37058541
PMCPMC10132551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.