Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37058253›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

The role of integrated psychological support in breast cancer patients: a randomized monocentric prospective study evaluating the Fil-Rouge Integrated Psycho-Oncological Support (FRIPOS) program.

Cristina Civilotti, Diana Lucchini, Gianluca Fogazzi, Fabrizio Palmieri, Alice Benenati, Alberto Buffoli, Veronica Girardi, Nella Ruzzenenti, Alessia Di Betta, Edoardo Donarelli and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Cristina Civilotti *Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Diana Lucchini *Breast Psycho-Oncology, EUSOMA-Certified Breast Unit, Istituto Clinico Sant'Anna, Via del Franzone 31, 25127, Brescia, Italy.
Gianluca FogazziBreast Medical Oncology, EUSOMA-Certified Breast Unit, Istituto Clinico Sant'Anna, Via del Franzone 31, 25127, Brescia, Italy.
Fabrizio PalmieriBreast Surgery, EUSOMA-Certified Breast Unit, Istituto Clinico Sant'Anna, Via del Franzone 31, 25127, Brescia, Italy.
Alice BenenatiBreast Surgery, EUSOMA-Certified Breast Unit, Istituto Clinico Sant'Anna, Via del Franzone 31, 25127, Brescia, Italy.
Alberto BuffoliRadiation Oncology, EUSOMA-Certified Breast Unit, Istituto Clinico Sant'Anna, Via del Franzone 31, 25127, Brescia, Italy.
Veronica GirardiBreast Radiology, EUSOMA-Certified Breast Unit, Istituto Clinico Sant'Anna, Via del Franzone 31, 25127, Brescia, Italy.
Nella RuzzenentiBreast Pathology, EUSOMA-Certified Breast Unit, Istituto Clinico Sant'Anna, Via del Franzone 31, 25127, Brescia, Italy.
Alessia Di BettaSalesian University Institute (IUSTO), Turin, Italy.
Edoardo DonarelliDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Fabio VegliaDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Giulia Di FiniDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. giulia.difini@unito.it.
Gabriella GandinoDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study examined the effects of Fil-Rouge Integrated Psycho-Oncological Support (FRIPOS) in a group of women with breast cancer compared with a group receiving treatment as usual (TAU).

methodsThe research design was a randomized, monocentric, prospective study with three time points of data collection: after the preoperative phase (T0), in the initial phase of treatments (T1), and 3 months after the start of treatments (T2). The FRIPOS group (N = 103) and the TAU group (N = 79) completed a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Symptom Checklist-90-R (SCL-90-R) at T0; the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 at T1; and SCL-90-R, EORTC QLQ-C30, and EORTC QLQ-BR23 at T2.

resultsA series of independent and paired t tests showed that patients in the FRIPOS group performed better on all scales related to symptomatic manifestations and on some quality of life scales (fatigue, dyspnea, and sleep disturbances) at T2. In addition, a series of ten multiple regressions were performed to predict each SCL subscale at T2 from the SCL score at T0 and the EORTC QLQ-C30 scores at T2. In nine of ten regression models (all except somatization), both FRIPOS group membership and QoL subscale contributed significantly to prediction.

conclusionsThis study suggests that patients in the FRIPOS group have more benefits in emotional, psychological, and collateral symptoms than patients in the TAU group and that these improvements are due to integrated psycho-oncology care.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansProspective StudiesPsycho-OncologyQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesAnxietyBreast cancerDepressionIntegrative carePsycho-oncologySupport

Identifiers

PMID37058253
PMCPMC10104919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.