SynthesisBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2023
Efficacy and safety of surgical energy devices for axillary node dissection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of Absorbable Polysaccharide Hemostatic Powder in the Prevention of Complications After Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- The effectiveness of different flap-raising techniques for mastectomy in reducing the rate of complications: a network meta-analysis.BMC surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various surgical energy devices are used for axillary lymph-node dissection. However, those that reduce seroma during axillary lymph-node dissection are unknown. We aimed to determine the best surgical energy device for reducing seroma by performing a network meta-analysis to synthesize the current evidence on the effectiveness of surgical energy devices for axillary node dissection for breast cancer patients. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform Search Portal. Two reviewers independently selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing (EBVS), ultrasonic coagulation shears (UCS), and conventional techniques for axillary node dissection. Primary outcomes were seroma, drained fluid volume (mL), and drainage duration (days). We analyzed random-effects and Bayesian network meta-analyses. We evaluated the confidence of each outcome using the CINeMA tool. We registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022335434). We included 34 RCTs with 2916 participants. Compared to the conventional techniques, UCS likely reduces seroma (risk ratio [RR], 0.61; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.49-0.73), the drained fluid volume (mean difference [MD], - 313 mL; 95% CrI - 496 to - 130), and drainage duration (MD - 1.79 days; 95% CrI - 2.91 to - 0.66). EBVS might have little effect on seroma, the drained fluid volume, and drainage duration compared to conventional techniques. UCS likely reduce seroma (RR 0.44; 95% CrI 0.28-0.69) compared to EBVS. Confidence levels were low to moderate. In conclusion, UCS are likely the best surgical energy device for seroma reduction during axillary node dissection for breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37058224What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.