Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37058222›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2023

Adapting a Medical School Cancer Research Education Program to the Virtual Environment: a Mixed-Methods Study.

Omar R Vayani, Hassaan Asif, Aviva Klein, Olwen M Hahn, Alexander T Pearson, Vineet M Arora, Olufunmilayo I Olopade, Daniel W Golden

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Omar R VayaniThe University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Hassaan AsifThe University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Aviva KleinSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Olwen M HahnSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Alexander T PearsonSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Vineet M AroraSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Olufunmilayo I OlopadeSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Daniel W GoldenDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. dgolden@radonc.uchicago.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2808-722X
University of Chicago · US

Funding

Re-Engineering Translational Research at the University of ChicagoUL1TR000430 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SOLWAY, JULIAN · 2012 to 2016
$20.2M
Scholars in Oncology Associated Research (SOAR)R25CA240134 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI OLUFUNMILAYO F. OLOPADE · 2019 to 2026
$1.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000430NCI NIH HHS R25 CA240134NIH HHS NIH 1R25CA240134-01NIH HHS NIH CTSA UL1 TR000430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With cancer incidence increasing worldwide, physicians with cancer research training are needed. The Scholars in Oncology-Associated Research (SOAR) cancer research education program was developed to train medical students in cancer research while exposing them to the breadth of clinical oncology. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, SOAR transitioned from in-person in 2019 to virtual in 2020 and hybrid in 2021. This study investigates positive and negative aspects of the varying educational formats. A mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate the educational formats. Pre- and post-surveys were collected from participants to assess their understanding of cancer as a clinical and research discipline. Structured interviews were conducted across all three cohorts, and thematic analysis was used to generate themes. A total of 37 students participated in SOAR and completed surveys (2019 n = 11, 2020 n = 14, and 2021 n = 12), and 18 interviews were conducted. Understanding of oncology as a clinical (p < 0.01 for all) and research discipline (p < 0.01 for all) improved within all three cohorts. There was no difference between each cohort's improvement in research understanding (p = 0.6). There was no difference between each cohort's understanding of oncology-related disciplines as both clinical and research disciplines (p > 0.1 for all). Thematic analysis demonstrated that hybrid and in-person formats were favored over a completely virtual one. Our findings demonstrate that a medical student cancer research education program is effective using in-person or hybrid formats for research education, although virtual experiences may be suboptimal to learning about clinical oncology.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsStudents, MedicalHumansLearningPandemicsSchools, Medical

Identifiers

PMID37058222
PMCPMC10102672
OpenAlexW4365482941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.