Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37057264›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2023

Molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations and

Husam Nassar, Wolfgang Sippl, Rana Abu Dahab, Mutasem Taha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Husam NassarDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Halle (Saale) 06120 Germany.
Wolfgang SipplDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Halle (Saale) 06120 Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5985-9261
Rana Abu DahabDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Biopharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Jordan Amman 11942 Jordan.
Mutasem TahaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Jordan Amman 11942 Jordan mutasem@ju.edu.jo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4453-072X
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEUniversity of Jordan · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GSK3β is a serine/threonine kinase that has been suggested as a putative drug target for several diseases. Recent studies have reported the beneficial effects of cephalosporin antibiotics in cancer and Alzheimer's disease, implying potential inhibition of GSK3β. To investigate this mechanism, four cephalosporins, namely, cefixime, ceftriaxone, cephalexin and cefadroxil were docked into the GSK3β binding pocket. The third-generation cephalosporins, cefixime and ceftriaxone, exhibited the best docking scores due to the exclusive hydrogen bonding between their aminothiazole group and hinge residues of GSK3β. The stability of top-ranked poses and the possibility of covalent bond formation between the carbonyl carbon of the β-lactam ring and the nucleophilic thiol of Cys-199 were evaluated by molecular dynamics simulations and covalent docking. Finally, the

Identifiers

PMID37057264
PMCPMC10087387
OpenAlexW4364861609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.