ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023
Application of multi-task transfer learning: The combination of EA and optimized subband regularized CSP to classification of 8-channel EEG signals with small dataset.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Few-Channel Brain-Computer Interface System Based on a Heuristic Algorithm.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhancing Deep-Learning Classification for Remote Motor Imagery Rehabilitation Using Multi-Subject Transfer Learning in IoT Environment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Optimal Channel Selection of Multiclass Motor Imagery Classification Based on Fusion Convolutional Neural Network with Attention Blocks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The volume conduction effect and high dimensional characteristics triggered by the excessive number of channels of EEG cap-acquired signals in BCI systems can increase the difficulty of classifying EEG signals and the lead time of signal acquisition. We aim to combine transfer learning to decode EEG signals in the few-channel case, improve the classification performance of the motor imagery BCI system across subject cases, reduce the cost of signal acquisition performed by the BCI system, and improve the usefulness of the system. Methods: Dataset2a from BCI CompetitionIV(2008) was used as Dataset1, and our team's self-collected dataset was used as Dataset2. Dataset1 acquired EEG signals from 9 subjects using a 22-channel device with a sampling frequency of 250 Hz. Dataset2 acquired EEG signals from 10 healthy subjects (8 males and 2 females; age distribution between 21-30 years old; mean age 25 years old) using an 8-channel system with a sampling frequency of 1000 Hz. We introduced EA in the data preprocessing process to reduce the signal differences between subjects and proposed VFB-RCSP in combination with RCSP and FBCSP to optimize the effect of feature extraction. Results: Experiments were conducted on Dataset1 with EEG data containing only 8 channels and achieved an accuracy of 78.01 and a kappa coefficient of 0.54. The accuracy exceeded most of the other methods proposed in recent years, even though the number of channels used was significantly reduced. On Dataset 2, an accuracy of 59.77 and a Kappa coefficient of 0.34 were achieved, which is a significant improvement compared to other poorly improved classical protocols. Discussion: Our work effectively improves the classification of few-channel EEG data. It overcomes the dependence of existing algorithms on the number of channels, the number of samples, and the frequency band, which is significant for reducing the complexity of BCI models and improving the user-friendliness of BCI systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.