ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023
Immunotherapy efficacy predictive tool for lung adenocarcinoma based on neural network.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- PIN1 serves as a prognostic and therapeutic biomarker in lung adenocarcinoma.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Article
- Machine learning models for predicting of PD-1 treatment efficacy in Pan-cancer patients based on routine hematologic and biochemical parameters.Cancer cell international · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Remarkably, the anti-cancer efficacy of immunotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) has been demonstrated. However, predicting the beneficiaries of this expensive treatment is still a challenge. Materials and methods: A group of patients (N = 250) diagnosed with LUAD and receiving immunotherapy were retrospectively studied. They were randomly divided into a training dataset (80%) and a test dataset (20%). The training dataset was utilized to train neural network models to predict patients' objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), responders (progression-free survival time > 6 months), and overall survival (OS) possibility, which were validated by both the training and test datasets and packaged into a tool later. Results: In the training dataset, the tool scored 0.9016 area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve on ORR judgment, 0.8570 on DCR, and 0.8395 on responder prediction. In the test dataset, the tool scored 0.8173 AUC on ORR, 0.8244 on DCR, and 0.8214 on responder determination. As for OS prediction, the tool scored 0.6627 AUC in the training dataset and 0.6357 in the test dataset. Conclusions: This immunotherapy efficacy predictive tool for LUAD patients based on neural networks could predict their ORR, DCR, and responder well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.