Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37056730›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

The association of coital incontinence with clinical factors and single voiding cycle ambulatory urodynamic monitoring findings in women.

Şerife Esra Çetinkaya, Mehmet Murat Seval, Bulut Varlı, Fulya Dökmeci

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Şerife Esra ÇetinkayaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Mehmet Murat SevalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Bulut VarlıDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Fulya DökmeciDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Ankara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Coital incontinence (CI) is a frequent problem in women with urinary incontinence (UI) with significant impact on female sexuality and quality of life. The underlying mechanism is controversial; it has been known that CI is associated with both stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and detrusor overactivity (DO). However, recently it has been reported that CI is mainly related with SUI and urethral incompetence, but not with DO. Ambulatory urodynamic monitoring (AUM) has been shown to be a sensitive tool for the detection of DO. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical risk factors for CI and the association of CI with urodynamic diagnoses at single voiding cycle AUM. Methods: Records of sexually active women with urinary incontinence attending the urogynaecology unit of a university hospital, who completed the PISQ-12 were reviewed retrospectively ( Results: Among all sexually active women with UI, 41.2% had CI; UI was more severe, symptom bother was higher, related quality of life ( Conclusion: Both clinical and AUM findings supported that CI is a more severe form of UI that it is mainly related with SUI and urethral incompetence, but not with UUI or DO.

Indexed as

ambulatory urodynamic monitoringclinical risk factorscoital incontinencedetrusor overactivitystress urinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID37056730
PMCPMC10087523
OpenAlexW4361205120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.