Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37056725›Full record

ArticleSoft science (Alhambra, Calif.)2022

Wearable electronics for skin wound monitoring and healing.

Shubham Patel, Faheem Ershad, Min Zhao, Roslyn Rivkah Isseroff, Bin Duan, Yubin Zhou, Yong Wang, Cunjiang Yu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Soft science (Alhambra, Calif.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shubham PatelDepartment of Engineering Science and Mechanics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Faheem ErshadDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Min ZhaoDepartment of Dermatology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95816, USA.
Roslyn Rivkah IsseroffDepartment of Dermatology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95816, USA.
Bin DuanMary & Dick Holland Regenerative Medicine Program and Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.
Yubin ZhouCenter for Translational Cancer Research, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Yong WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Cunjiang YuDepartment of Engineering Science and Mechanics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Pennsylvania State University · USUniversity of California, Davis · USTexas A&M University · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

Development of An Optoelectronically Active BioinkR21EB030257 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI YU, CUNJIANG · 2020 to 2020
$694k
Developing Hybrids of Cardiac Tissue and Biodegradable Electronics Towards Heart Implants with On-line Monitoring and Stimulating FunctionsR21EB026175 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI YU, CUNJIANG · 2018 to 2019
$468k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB026175NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB030257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound healing is one of the most complex processes in the human body, supported by many cellular events that are tightly coordinated to repair the wound efficiently. Chronic wounds have potentially life-threatening consequences. Traditional wound dressings come in direct contact with wounds to help them heal and avoid further complications. However, traditional wound dressings have some limitations. These dressings do not provide real-time information on wound conditions, leading clinicians to miss the best time for adjusting treatment. Moreover, the current diagnosis of wounds is relatively subjective. Wearable electronics have become a unique platform to potentially monitor wound conditions in a continuous manner accurately and even to serve as accelerated healing vehicles. In this review, we briefly discuss the wound status with some objective parameters/biomarkers influencing wound healing, followed by the presentation of various novel wearable devices used for monitoring wounds and accelerating wound healing. We further summarize the associated device working principles. This review concludes by highlighting some major challenges in wearable devices toward wound healing that need to be addressed by the research community.

Indexed as

sensorsWearable electronicswound healingwound monitoring

Identifiers

PMID37056725
PMCPMC10093663
OpenAlexW4285106104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.