Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37056722›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2023

3D interaction homology: The hydrophobic residues alanine, isoleucine, leucine, proline and valine play different structural roles in soluble and membrane proteins.

Mohammed H Al Mughram, Claudio Catalano, Noah B Herrington, Martin K Safo, Glen E Kellogg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. AncestralAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Gain-of-Function VariantCirculation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohammed H Al MughramDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and the Institute for Structural Biology, Drug Discovery and Development, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Claudio CatalanoDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and the Institute for Structural Biology, Drug Discovery and Development, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Noah B HerringtonDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and the Institute for Structural Biology, Drug Discovery and Development, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Martin K SafoDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and the Institute for Structural Biology, Drug Discovery and Development, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Glen E KelloggDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and the Institute for Structural Biology, Drug Discovery and Development, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Virginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aliphatic hydrophobic amino acid residues-alanine, isoleucine, leucine, proline and valine-are among the most common found in proteins. Their structural role in proteins is seemingly obvious: engage in hydrophobic interactions to stabilize secondary, and to a lesser extent, tertiary and quaternary structure. However, favorable hydrophobic interactions involving the sidechains of these residue types are generally less significant than the unfavorable set arising from interactions with polar atoms. Importantly, the constellation of interactions between residue sidechains and their environments can be recorded as three-dimensional maps that, in turn, can be clustered. The clustered average map sets compose a library of interaction profiles encoding interaction strengths, interaction types and the optimal 3D position for the interacting partners. This library is backbone angle-dependent and suggests solvent and lipid accessibility for each unique interaction profile. In this work, in addition to analysis of soluble proteins, a large set of membrane proteins that contained optimized artificial lipids were evaluated by parsing the structures into three distinct components: soluble extramembrane domain, lipid facing transmembrane domain, core transmembrane domain. The aliphatic residues were extracted from each of these sets and passed through our calculation protocol. Notable observations include: the roles of aliphatic residues in soluble proteins and in the membrane protein's soluble domains are nearly identical, although the latter are slightly more solvent accessible; by comparing maps calculated with sidechain-lipid interactions to maps ignoring those interactions, the potential extent of residue-lipid and residue-interactions can be assessed and likely exploited in structure prediction and modeling; amongst these residue types, the levels of lipid engagement show isoleucine as the most engaged, while the other residues are largely interacting with neighboring helical residues.

Indexed as

hydropathic interactionshydrophobic residueslipid interactionsmembrane proteinssolvent-accessible surface area (SASA)

Identifiers

PMID37056722
PMCPMC10086146
OpenAlexW4361205324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.