ArticleFrontiers in public health2023
Planned adaptation and implementation of the
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this paper is to report on the implementation of an evidence-based model, VIVA, which was developed to translate physical activity (PA) recommendations to rural environments and was scaled-up to 12 rural communities across New Mexico. Our longitudinal qualitative research describes processes of planned adaptation in the rural context with an exploration of inner and outer context adaptations that consider important implementation constructs including leadership, partnership and collaboration. Materials & methods: An enhanced version of the RE-AIM framework was used to formulate community-level engagement and process questions essential to implementation science. Qualitative methods, using a thematic approach that included both inductive and deductive coding with attention to processes, was used to explore adaptation at the community level. Data included semi-structured interviews with 17 community leaders at baseline and 10 at follow-up, fieldnotes, and technical assistance tracking forms. Analysis was conducted with NVivo qualitative data analysis software. Results: Analysis demonstrated how planned adaptation of the implementation model was critical to dissemination in rural communities. Understanding and adapting to local context-including geography, culture, economics-is essential for implementation. Inner context constructs, recognized as important across implementation models, including leadership, partnerships and political engagement were found to be key to implementation success. Moreover, we provide concrete examples of the range and complexity of these issues in rural communities, and how these shaped implementation uptake and success. Discussion: Studying processes of planned adaptation in rural contexts will further implementation science efforts to move evidence into practice. It is essential to incorporate planned adaptation to local, community contexts to create models which are simple to encourage adoption, are evidence-based, and are adaptable to local conditions without compromising the integrity of the evidence-based model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.